DRUNF
Price
$16.19
Change
+$0.79 (+5.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
734.99M
MTSFF
Price
$9.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRUNF vs MTSFF

Header iconDRUNF vs MTSFF Comparison
Open Charts DRUNF vs MTSFFBanner chart's image
Dream Un
Price$16.19
Change+$0.79 (+5.13%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization734.99M
Mitsui Fudosan
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.9K
Capitalization19.35B
DRUNF vs MTSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DRUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DRUNF vs. MTSFF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRUNF is a Hold and MTSFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (DRUNF: $16.19 vs. MTSFF: $9.66)
Brand notoriety: DRUNF and MTSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRUNF: 100% vs. MTSFF: 123%
Market capitalization -- DRUNF: $734.99M vs. MTSFF: $19.35B
DRUNF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $734.99M. MTSFF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $19.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRUNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTSFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DRUNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRUNF is a better buy in the long-term than MTSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRUNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTSFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRUNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTSFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DRUNF is a better buy in the short-term than MTSFF.

Price Growth

DRUNF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +9.88% price change this week, while MTSFF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTSFF($19.4B) has a higher market cap than DRUNF($735M). MTSFF has higher P/E ratio than DRUNF: MTSFF (13.79) vs DRUNF (5.29). MTSFF YTD gains are higher at: 22.745 vs. DRUNF (5.404). MTSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 352B vs. DRUNF (318M). MTSFF has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. DRUNF (97.1M). DRUNF has less debt than MTSFF: DRUNF (1.53B) vs MTSFF (4.28T). MTSFF has higher revenues than DRUNF: MTSFF (2.26T) vs DRUNF (317M).
DRUNFMTSFFDRUNF / MTSFF
Capitalization735M19.4B4%
EBITDA318M352B0%
Gain YTD5.40422.74524%
P/E Ratio5.2913.7938%
Revenue317M2.26T0%
Total Cash97.1M170B0%
Total Debt1.53B4.28T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DRUNF vs MTSFF: Fundamental Ratings
DRUNF
MTSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8533
SMR RATING
1..100
62100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4677
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRUNF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (45). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MTSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DRUNF (85). This means that MTSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DRUNF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTSFF (100). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (52). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

DRUNF's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MTSFF (77). This means that DRUNF’s stock grew similarly to MTSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRUNFMTSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSBC19.080.18
+0.95%
Old Second Bancorp
TROX5.580.05
+0.90%
Tronox Limited
FRAF37.060.30
+0.82%
Franklin Financial Services Corp
BEKE17.670.02
+0.11%
KE Holdings
HCWB4.06-0.11
-2.64%
HCW Biologics Inc

DRUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DRUNF and VONOY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRUNF and VONOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRUNF
1D Price
Change %
DRUNF100%
+5.13%
VONOY - DRUNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
SVAUF - DRUNF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - DRUNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTSFF - DRUNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UOLGY - DRUNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

MTSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTSFF and MTSFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTSFF and MTSFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTSFF
1D Price
Change %
MTSFF100%
N/A
MTSFY - MTSFF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
DRUNF - MTSFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.13%
MITEF - MTSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMEHF - MTSFF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEY - MTSFF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
More