DRSHF vs QMCO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRSHF is a Hold and QMCO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DRSHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DRSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QMCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DRSHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QMCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DRSHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QMCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DRSHF (@Computer Peripherals) experienced а +30.53% price change this week, while QMCO (@Computer Peripherals) price change was -6.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Peripherals industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
QMCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Peripherals (+0.50% weekly)Computer peripherals connect to a computer system to add functionality or to get information from or put information into computers. Think hard disk drive, data storage systems, cloud storage devices, printer and scanner, or mouse, keyboard etc. Some of the major companies operating in the computer peripherals industry include Western Digital Corporation, Seagate Technology PLC, NetApp, Inc., Zebra Technologies Corporation, and Xerox Holdings Corp.
| DRSHF | QMCO | DRSHF / QMCO | |
| Capitalization | 117M | 56.6M | 207% |
| EBITDA | -3.28M | -14.29M | 23% |
| Gain YTD | 54.872 | -80.861 | -68% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 16.8M | 407M | 4% |
| Total Cash | 10.2M | 25.5M | 40% |
| Total Debt | 596K | 111M | 1% |
DRSHF | QMCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 49 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QMCO's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DRSHF (75). This means that QMCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than DRSHF’s over the last 12 months.
DRSHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QMCO (100). This means that DRSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
DRSHF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as QMCO (100). This means that DRSHF’s stock grew similarly to QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
DRSHF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as QMCO (59). This means that DRSHF’s stock grew similarly to QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
DRSHF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QMCO (100). This means that DRSHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QMCO’s over the last 12 months.
| DRSHF | QMCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
DRSHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DRSHF and DELL have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRSHF and DELL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DRSHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRSHF | 100% | +5.81% | ||
| DELL - DRSHF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.73% | ||
| AGMH - DRSHF | 7% Poorly correlated | -4.53% | ||
| CAJFF - DRSHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CAN - DRSHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
| QMCO - DRSHF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
QMCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QMCO has been loosely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QMCO jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QMCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMCO | 100% | -0.77% | ||
| RGTI - QMCO | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| QBTS - QMCO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| QUBT - QMCO | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| IONQ - QMCO | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.76% | ||
| HAUP - QMCO | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||