Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDIX vs FXAIX
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDIX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I
Price$24.97
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets577.11M
DRDIX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDIX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDIX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. DRDIX (577M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDIX: FXAIX (1.11) vs DRDIX (0.70). DRDIX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDIX (13 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). DRDIX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDIX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDIX (500000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.48 vs. DRDIX (-1.32). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.07 vs. DRDIX (32.48).
| DRDIX | FXAIX | DRDIX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.01 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.01 | 6,867% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.554 | 18.557 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 577M | 739B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.11 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.32 | 15.48 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 86.97 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 100.07 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.35 | 270.59 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement