DRDGF
Price
$1.54
Change
-$0.03 (-1.91%)
Updated
May 20 closing price
Capitalization
728.78M
NEM
Price
$56.76
Change
-$2.43 (-4.11%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
42B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DRDGF vs NEM

Header iconDRDGF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts DRDGF vs NEMBanner chart's image
DRDGOLD
Price$1.54
Change-$0.03 (-1.91%)
Volume$400
Capitalization728.78M
Newmont
Price$56.76
Change-$2.43 (-4.11%)
Volume$16.61M
Capitalization42B
DRDGF vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DRDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DRDGF vs. NEM commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDGF is a Hold and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DRDGF: $1.54 vs. NEM: $56.76)
Brand notoriety: DRDGF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DRDGF: 73% vs. NEM: 131%
Market capitalization -- DRDGF: $728.78M vs. NEM: $42B
DRDGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $728.78M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DRDGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DRDGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DRDGF is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DRDGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DRDGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DRDGF and NEM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DRDGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than DRDGF($729M). NEM has higher P/E ratio than DRDGF: NEM (36.25) vs DRDGF (9.99). DRDGF YTD gains are higher at: 70.732 vs. NEM (54.122). DRDGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.8B vs. NEM (320M). NEM has higher revenues than DRDGF: NEM (11.8B) vs DRDGF (5.12B).
DRDGFNEMDRDGF / NEM
Capitalization729M42B2%
EBITDA1.8B320M562%
Gain YTD70.73254.122131%
P/E Ratio9.9936.2528%
Revenue5.12B11.8B43%
Total CashN/A3.03B-
Total DebtN/A9.44B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DRDGF vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
DRDGF
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7784
SMR RATING
1..100
1951
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
397
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2280
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DRDGF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NEM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DRDGF’s stock grew significantly faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

DRDGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (84) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DRDGF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

DRDGF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (51) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DRDGF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as DRDGF (39) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to DRDGF’s over the last 12 months.

DRDGF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (80) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DRDGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DRDGFNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DRDGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DWAS84.851.65
+1.99%
Invesco Dorsey Wright SmallCap Momt ETF
NFLY19.050.12
+0.63%
YieldMax NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF
XUSP41.690.22
+0.53%
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated US Eq ETF
IQLT42.79N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF
DCAP21.38N/A
N/A
Unity Wealth Partners Dynamic Capital Appreciation & Options ETF

DRDGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DRDGF and VTXXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DRDGF and VTXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DRDGF
1D Price
Change %
DRDGF100%
N/A
VTXXF - DRDGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLGDF - DRDGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NEM - DRDGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
BONXF - DRDGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
-4.11%
AEM - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
-5.63%
WPM - NEM
75%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
RGLD - NEM
75%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
AGI - NEM
72%
Closely correlated
-2.10%
KGC - NEM
69%
Closely correlated
-6.18%
More