Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$25.13
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets594.14M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 737B vs. DRDCX (594M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (13 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.91 vs. DRDCX (-6.96). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.56 vs. DRDCX (30.78).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.782 | 17.707 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 594M | 737B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.96 | 15.91 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.14 | 80.75 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.78 | 105.56 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.68 | 267.09 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement