Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$25.44
Change+$0.20 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets610.46M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 723B vs. DRDCX (610M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.12) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (13 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.54 vs. DRDCX (-4.93). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 105.92 vs. DRDCX (34.20).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.038 | 14.435 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 610M | 723B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.93 | 15.54 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.83 | 87.16 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.20 | 105.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.17 | 261.52 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers