Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$24.57
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 739B vs. DRDCX (579M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.11) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (13 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.86 vs. DRDCX (-2.34). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 100.72 vs. DRDCX (26.94).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.486 | 18.942 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 579M | 739B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.34 | 15.86 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 87.58 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.94 | 100.72 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.53 | 271.79 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement