Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDCX vs FXAIX
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts DRDCX vs FXAIX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend C
Price$24.56
Change-$0.96 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets560.81M
DRDCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDCX is a StrongBuy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 753B vs. DRDCX (561M). FXAIX pays higher dividends than DRDCX: FXAIX (1.10) vs DRDCX (0.00). DRDCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: DRDCX (13 years) vs FXAIX (15 years). DRDCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). DRDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.20 vs. FXAIX (3.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDCX: FXAIX (0) vs DRDCX (5000). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. DRDCX (-3.53). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 93.74 vs. DRDCX (25.79).
| DRDCX | FXAIX | DRDCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.01 | 13,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.01 | 13,533% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.904 | 1.998 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 753B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.53 | 17.83 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.54 | 75.94 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.79 | 93.74 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.58 | 310.97 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers