Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DRDAX vs RWMFX
DRDAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts DRDAX vs RWMFX
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend A
Price$26.37
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets629.92M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.43
Change-$0.15 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
DRDAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DRDAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DRDAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. DRDAX (630M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than DRDAX: RWMFX (1.46) vs DRDAX (0.49). DRDAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: DRDAX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). DRDAX (1.28) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. DRDAX (14.20). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DRDAX: RWMFX (250) vs DRDAX (5000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.61 vs. DRDAX (3.70). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.87 vs. DRDAX (44.84).
| DRDAX | RWMFX | DRDAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.31 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.31 | 413% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.051 | 7.164 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 630M | 203B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.46 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 6.61 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.42 | 24.20 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.84 | 49.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.59 | 70.91 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement