DPZUF
Price
$9.05
Change
+$0.37 (+4.26%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
840.36M
JBFCY
Price
$14.55
Change
-$0.35 (-2.35%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.14B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs JBFCY

Header iconDPZUF vs JBFCY Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs JBFCYBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$9.05
Change+$0.37 (+4.26%)
Volume$145
Capitalization840.36M
Jollibee Foods
Price$14.55
Change-$0.35 (-2.35%)
Volume$179
Capitalization4.14B
DPZUF vs JBFCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. JBFCY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and JBFCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $9.05 vs. JBFCY: $14.55)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and JBFCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 28% vs. JBFCY: 24%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $840.36M vs. JBFCY: $4.14B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $840.36M. JBFCY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJBFCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBFCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the long-term than JBFCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBFCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • JBFCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the short-term than JBFCY.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while JBFCY (@Restaurants) price change was -5.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.27% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBFCY($4.14B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($840M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than JBFCY: DPZUF (133.33) vs JBFCY (23.82). JBFCY YTD gains are higher at: -16.651 vs. DPZUF (-50.815). JBFCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.7B vs. DPZUF (180M). JBFCY has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. DPZUF (153M). DPZUF has less debt than JBFCY: DPZUF (1.5B) vs JBFCY (133B). JBFCY has higher revenues than DPZUF: JBFCY (289B) vs DPZUF (2.3B).
DPZUFJBFCYDPZUF / JBFCY
Capitalization840M4.14B20%
EBITDA180M39.7B0%
Gain YTD-50.815-16.651305%
P/E Ratio133.3323.82560%
Revenue2.3B289B1%
Total Cash153M32.9B0%
Total Debt1.5B133B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs JBFCY: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
JBFCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8483
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a8

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as JBFCY (45). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to JBFCY’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (93). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (95). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JBFCY (71). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than JBFCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFJBFCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPBC44.340.25
+0.58%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Stgy ETF
SPUS48.880.26
+0.53%
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Ex ETF
PFFV23.260.02
+0.07%
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
BTOP35.63-0.02
-0.06%
Bitwise Trendwise BTC/ETH and Treasuries
FIAT2.92-0.03
-1.02%
YieldMax Short COIN Option Inc Strgy ETF

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
+4.32%
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
JBFCY - DPZUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More

JBFCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JBFCY and JBFCF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JBFCY and JBFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBFCY
1D Price
Change %
JBFCY100%
-2.35%
JBFCF - JBFCY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
LKNCY - JBFCY
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
DPZUF - JBFCY
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
JDWPY - JBFCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - JBFCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More