DPZUF
Price
$12.40
Change
-$0.95 (-7.12%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.18B
JBFCY
Price
$16.00
Change
-$0.76 (-4.53%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs JBFCY

Header iconDPZUF vs JBFCY Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs JBFCYBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$12.40
Change-$0.95 (-7.12%)
Volume$304
Capitalization1.18B
Jollibee Foods
Price$16.00
Change-$0.76 (-4.53%)
Volume$830
Capitalization4.49B
DPZUF vs JBFCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. JBFCY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and JBFCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $12.40 vs. JBFCY: $16.00)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and JBFCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 16% vs. JBFCY: 128%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $1.18B vs. JBFCY: $4.49B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.18B. JBFCY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $208.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJBFCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBFCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, JBFCY is a better buy in the long-term than DPZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBFCY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • JBFCY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the short-term than JBFCY.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а -11.43% price change this week, while JBFCY (@Restaurants) price change was -4.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.36% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBFCY($4.49B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($1.18B). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than JBFCY: DPZUF (137.10) vs JBFCY (26.40). JBFCY YTD gains are higher at: -8.344 vs. DPZUF (-32.609). JBFCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.5B vs. DPZUF (195M). JBFCY has higher revenues than DPZUF: JBFCY (279B) vs DPZUF (2.26B).
DPZUFJBFCYDPZUF / JBFCY
Capitalization1.18B4.49B26%
EBITDA195M38.5B1%
Gain YTD-32.609-8.344391%
P/E Ratio137.1026.40519%
Revenue2.26B279B1%
Total CashN/A27.9B-
Total DebtN/A133B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs JBFCY: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
JBFCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10040
SMR RATING
1..100
9155
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
657
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as JBFCY (49). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to JBFCY’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (91). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCY's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (90). This means that JBFCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JBFCY (57). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JBFCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFJBFCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCAT15.070.06
+0.40%
BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust
XITK186.600.32
+0.17%
SPDR® FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
SMHX31.270.03
+0.10%
VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF
WINC24.26N/A
+0.02%
Western Asset Short Duration Inc ETF
CHAT48.26-0.32
-0.66%
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-7.12%
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.80%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRIUF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
More

JBFCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JBFCY and JBFCF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JBFCY and JBFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBFCY
1D Price
Change %
JBFCY100%
N/A
JBFCF - JBFCY
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
LKNCY - JBFCY
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
DPZUF - JBFCY
1%
Poorly correlated
-7.12%
JDWPY - JBFCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - JBFCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More