DPZUF
Price
$8.99
Change
+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
828.82M
JBFCF
Price
$4.20
Change
+$0.20 (+5.00%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs JBFCF

Header iconDPZUF vs JBFCF Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs JBFCFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$8.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Volume$361
Capitalization828.82M
Jollibee Foods
Price$4.20
Change+$0.20 (+5.00%)
Volume$487
Capitalization4.22B
DPZUF vs JBFCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. JBFCF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and JBFCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $8.99 vs. JBFCF: $4.20)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and JBFCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 72% vs. JBFCF: 18%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $828.82M vs. JBFCF: $4.22B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $828.82M. JBFCF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJBFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JBFCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the long-term than JBFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JBFCF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • JBFCF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JBFCF is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while JBFCF (@Restaurants) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-1.44% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JBFCF($4.22B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($829M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than JBFCF: DPZUF (133.33) vs JBFCF (27.19). JBFCF YTD gains are higher at: -7.895 vs. DPZUF (-51.141). JBFCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.7B vs. DPZUF (180M). JBFCF has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. DPZUF (153M). DPZUF has less debt than JBFCF: DPZUF (1.5B) vs JBFCF (133B). JBFCF has higher revenues than DPZUF: JBFCF (289B) vs DPZUF (2.3B).
DPZUFJBFCFDPZUF / JBFCF
Capitalization829M4.22B20%
EBITDA180M39.7B0%
Gain YTD-51.141-7.895648%
P/E Ratio133.3327.19490%
Revenue2.3B289B1%
Total Cash153M32.9B0%
Total Debt1.5B133B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs JBFCF: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
JBFCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10062
SMR RATING
1..100
9357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
356
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JBFCF (53). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JBFCF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (100). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (93). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

JBFCF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZUF (95). This means that JBFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JBFCF (56). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than JBFCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFJBFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JBFCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSPCX92.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Insurance Port
COFYX41.33-0.20
-0.48%
Columbia Contrarian Core Inst3
ICVPX12.72-0.08
-0.62%
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II S2
JFDRX19.28-0.18
-0.92%
JHancock Financial Industries R6
CRBRX14.14-0.26
-1.81%
Columbia Acorn Inst2

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.06%
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.93%
JBFCY - DPZUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
More

JBFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JBFCF and JDWPF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JBFCF and JDWPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JBFCF
1D Price
Change %
JBFCF100%
+4.93%
JDWPF - JBFCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKNCY - JBFCF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
JBFCY - JBFCF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
DPZUF - JBFCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - JBFCF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More