DPZUF
Price
$9.23
Change
-$1.04 (-10.13%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
874.37M
HLFFF
Price
$8.75
Change
-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZUF vs HLFFF

Header iconDPZUF vs HLFFF Comparison
Open Charts DPZUF vs HLFFFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$9.23
Change-$1.04 (-10.13%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization874.37M
Hellofresh SE
Price$8.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
Volume$204
Capitalization1.44B
DPZUF vs HLFFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZUF vs. HLFFF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZUF is a Hold and HLFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZUF: $9.23 vs. HLFFF: $8.75)
Brand notoriety: DPZUF and HLFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZUF: 218% vs. HLFFF: 19%
Market capitalization -- DPZUF: $874.37M vs. HLFFF: $1.44B
DPZUF [@Restaurants] is valued at $874.37M. HLFFF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $225.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLFFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLFFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the long-term than HLFFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLFFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLFFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLFFF is a better buy in the short-term than DPZUF.

Price Growth

DPZUF (@Restaurants) experienced а -10.13% price change this week, while HLFFF (@Restaurants) price change was -5.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.54% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLFFF($1.44B) has a higher market cap than DPZUF($874M). DPZUF has higher P/E ratio than HLFFF: DPZUF (133.33) vs HLFFF (67.77). HLFFF YTD gains are higher at: -26.409 vs. DPZUF (-49.837). HLFFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 316M vs. DPZUF (195M). HLFFF has higher revenues than DPZUF: HLFFF (7.27B) vs DPZUF (2.26B).
DPZUFHLFFFDPZUF / HLFFF
Capitalization874M1.44B61%
EBITDA195M316M62%
Gain YTD-49.837-26.409189%
P/E Ratio133.3367.77197%
Revenue2.26B7.27B31%
Total CashN/A446M-
Total DebtN/A742M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZUF vs HLFFF: Fundamental Ratings
DPZUF
HLFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9296
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9064
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
311
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLFFF (71). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFFF (100). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFFF (96). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

HLFFF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (90). This means that HLFFF’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as HLFFF (11). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to HLFFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZUFHLFFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLFFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGVRX46.300.22
+0.48%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R5
PCITX26.090.03
+0.12%
Victory Pioneer International Equ C
FGDIX46.32N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Gold I
SEIRX16.13N/A
N/A
SEI Real Estate I (SIMT)
GXXIX13.87-0.01
-0.07%
abrdn US Sustainable Leaders InstlSvc

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and HLFFF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and HLFFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
-10.13%
HLFFF - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
DPUKY - DPZUF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
KRIUF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBFCF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLFFF and HELFY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLFFF and HELFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLFFF
1D Price
Change %
HLFFF100%
-0.08%
HELFY - HLFFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.37%
LKNCY - HLFFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
HDALF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPZUF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.13%
GGGSF - HLFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More