DPZ
Price
$426.93
Change
-$4.76 (-1.10%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.59B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCD
Price
$308.53
Change
+$0.82 (+0.27%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
219.14B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs MCD

Header iconDPZ vs MCD Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs MCDBanner chart's image
Dominos Pizza
Price$426.93
Change-$4.76 (-1.10%)
Volume$23.87K
Capitalization14.59B
McDonald's
Price$308.53
Change+$0.82 (+0.27%)
Volume$62.32K
Capitalization219.14B
DPZ vs MCD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. MCD commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a StrongBuy and MCD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (DPZ: $431.69 vs. MCD: $307.71)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and MCD are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 81% vs. MCD: 163%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $14.59B vs. MCD: $219.14B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $14.59B. MCD’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $219.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCD’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCD’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCD is a better buy in the short-term than DPZ.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.87% price change this week, while MCD (@Restaurants) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

MCD is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+0.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCD($219B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($14.6B). MCD (26.26) and DPZ (25.23) have similar P/E ratio . MCD YTD gains are higher at: 7.975 vs. DPZ (4.062). MCD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.2B vs. DPZ (1.05B). DPZ has less debt than MCD: DPZ (5.21B) vs MCD (55.9B). MCD has higher revenues than DPZ: MCD (26.1B) vs DPZ (4.78B).
DPZMCDDPZ / MCD
Capitalization14.6B219B7%
EBITDA1.05B14.2B7%
Gain YTD4.0627.97551%
P/E Ratio25.2326.2696%
Revenue4.78B26.1B18%
Total CashN/A1.88B-
Total Debt5.21B55.9B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs MCD: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
MCD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2268
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8217
SMR RATING
1..100
1008
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCD's Valuation (67) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (69). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (82). This means that MCD’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's SMR Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that MCD’s stock grew significantly faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (59). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

MCD's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (58). This means that MCD’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZMCD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXA65.360.35
+0.54%
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust
QUS173.760.75
+0.43%
Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA StratFacs ETF
BOCT49.190.09
+0.19%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct
XIJN30.820.03
+0.08%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Bffr & Prm Inc ETF -June
RYSE22.73-0.14
-0.61%
Cboe Vest 10 Yr Intst Rt Hdg ETF

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
+1.66%
YUM - DPZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
QSR - DPZ
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
CAKE - DPZ
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
MCD - DPZ
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More

MCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCD has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCD jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCD
1D Price
Change %
MCD100%
+2.32%
YUM - MCD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
QSR - MCD
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
DPZ - MCD
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
WEN - MCD
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
ARCO - MCD
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
More