DPXCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
7.97M
FNNTF
Price
$31.25
Change
-$0.65 (-2.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPXCF vs FNNTF

Header iconDPXCF vs FNNTF Comparison
Open Charts DPXCF vs FNNTFBanner chart's image
DelphX Capital Markets
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$232K
Capitalization7.97M
FLATEXDEGIRO AG
Price$31.25
Change-$0.65 (-2.04%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization3.49B
DPXCF vs FNNTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPXCF vs. FNNTF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPXCF is a Hold and FNNTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DPXCF: $0.04 vs. FNNTF: $31.25)
Brand notoriety: DPXCF and FNNTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPXCF: 411% vs. FNNTF: 335%
Market capitalization -- DPXCF: $7.97M vs. FNNTF: $3.49B
DPXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.97M. FNNTF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $3.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPXCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPXCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FNNTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNTF is a better buy in the long-term than DPXCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPXCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPXCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNNTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNTF is a better buy in the short-term than DPXCF.

Price Growth

DPXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FNNTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +11.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+11.86% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNNTF($3.49B) has a higher market cap than DPXCF($7.97M). FNNTF YTD gains are higher at: 106.271 vs. DPXCF (-39.726).
DPXCFFNNTFDPXCF / FNNTF
Capitalization7.97M3.49B0%
EBITDA-3.1MN/A-
Gain YTD-39.726106.271-37%
P/E RatioN/A22.15-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash354KN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPXCF vs FNNTF: Fundamental Ratings
DPXCF
FNNTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
10054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPXCF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNTF (95). This means that DPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (100). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPXCF (100). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (65). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNTF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DPXCF (100). This means that FNNTF’s stock grew significantly faster than DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPXCFFNNTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIGAX35.690.31
+0.88%
Invesco International Growth A
GMVAX16.810.07
+0.42%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity A
PSSPX28.320.09
+0.32%
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R5
AQGRX12.870.01
+0.08%
AQR Global Equity R6
VSMPX291.85-0.57
-0.19%
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Pls

DPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPXCF and EUXTF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPXCF and EUXTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPXCF
1D Price
Change %
DPXCF100%
N/A
EUXTF - DPXCF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEHSF - DPXCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLTLF - DPXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
DSEEY - DPXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.85%
DMGGF - DPXCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+6.80%
More

FNNTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNNTF has been loosely correlated with SRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNNTF jumps, then SRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNTF
1D Price
Change %
FNNTF100%
-2.04%
SRL - FNNTF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLTLF - FNNTF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
PIHG - FNNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPXCF - FNNTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABIT - FNNTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More