DPXCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
12.59M
FLTLF
Price
$31.23
Change
-$0.60 (-1.89%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
814.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPXCF vs FLTLF

Header iconDPXCF vs FLTLF Comparison
Open Charts DPXCF vs FLTLFBanner chart's image
DelphX Capital Markets
Price$0.04
Change-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization12.59M
FLOW TRADERS
Price$31.23
Change-$0.60 (-1.89%)
Volume$800
Capitalization814.57M
DPXCF vs FLTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPXCF vs. FLTLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPXCF is a Hold and FLTLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DPXCF: $0.04 vs. FLTLF: $31.23)
Brand notoriety: DPXCF and FLTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPXCF: 23% vs. FLTLF: 110%
Market capitalization -- DPXCF: $12.59M vs. FLTLF: $814.57M
DPXCF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $12.59M. FLTLF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $814.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPXCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPXCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLTLF is a better buy in the long-term than DPXCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLTLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FLTLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DPXCF and FLTLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DPXCF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FLTLF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.06% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLTLF($815M) has a higher market cap than DPXCF($12.6M). FLTLF YTD gains are higher at: 38.289 vs. DPXCF (-39.726). DPXCF has less debt than FLTLF: DPXCF (0) vs FLTLF (2.58B). FLTLF has higher revenues than DPXCF: FLTLF (484M) vs DPXCF (0).
DPXCFFLTLFDPXCF / FLTLF
Capitalization12.6M815M2%
EBITDA-3.63MN/A-
Gain YTD-39.72638.289-104%
P/E RatioN/A13.11-
Revenue0484M-
Total Cash115KN/A-
Total Debt02.58B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPXCF vs FLTLF: Fundamental Ratings
DPXCF
FLTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLTLF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (50). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FLTLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (100). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FLTLF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (100). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FLTLF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPXCF (87). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

FLTLF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as DPXCF (100). This means that FLTLF’s stock grew similarly to DPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPXCFFLTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
32%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMGPX52.890.64
+1.22%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R3
ILVBX10.560.06
+0.57%
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Val A
IEDAX11.910.06
+0.51%
Voya Large Cap Value A
DCSYX64.290.16
+0.25%
Davis Balanced Fund Y
FFNIX13.730.02
+0.15%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% I

DPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPXCF and EUXTF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPXCF and EUXTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPXCF
1D Price
Change %
DPXCF100%
N/A
EUXTF - DPXCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
HEHSF - DPXCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLTLF - DPXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
DSEEY - DPXCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
DMGGF - DPXCF
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
More

FLTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLTLF and STGC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLTLF and STGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLTLF
1D Price
Change %
FLTLF100%
-1.89%
STGC - FLTLF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OPY - FLTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
DPXCF - FLTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EUXTF - FLTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
FNNTF - FLTLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More