DPMLF
Price
$21.24
Change
-$0.23 (-1.07%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.73B
41 days until earnings call
RVLGF
Price
$0.51
Change
+$0.03 (+6.25%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
105.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPMLF vs RVLGF

Header iconDPMLF vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts DPMLF vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
DPM Metals
Price$21.24
Change-$0.23 (-1.07%)
Volume$191.18K
Capitalization4.73B
Revival Gold
Price$0.51
Change+$0.03 (+6.25%)
Volume$216.33K
Capitalization105.81M
DPMLF vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPMLF vs. RVLGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPMLF is a Hold and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (DPMLF: $21.24 vs. RVLGF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: DPMLF and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPMLF: 164% vs. RVLGF: 84%
Market capitalization -- DPMLF: $4.73B vs. RVLGF: $105.81M
DPMLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $4.73B. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $105.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPMLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPMLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPMLF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPMLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPMLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the short-term than DPMLF.

Price Growth

DPMLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.89% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPMLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPMLF($4.73B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($106M). RVLGF YTD gains are higher at: 153.831 vs. DPMLF (134.433). DPMLF has more cash in the bank: 332M vs. RVLGF (3.05M).
DPMLFRVLGFDPMLF / RVLGF
Capitalization4.73B106M4,466%
EBITDA367MN/A-
Gain YTD134.433153.83187%
P/E Ratio14.96N/A-
Revenue657MN/A-
Total Cash332M3.05M10,889%
Total Debt13.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPMLF vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
DPMLF
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
4698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPMLF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (63). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (98). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as DPMLF (38). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to DPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that DPMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPMLFRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBO30.240.01
+0.05%
WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Priv Eq ETF
PAB42.85-0.08
-0.17%
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
DJD54.49-0.16
-0.29%
Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF
FIW109.79-0.61
-0.55%
First Trust Water ETF
GPTY46.41-0.62
-1.32%
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

DPMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPMLF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPMLF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPMLF
1D Price
Change %
DPMLF100%
-1.05%
AEM - DPMLF
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
AGI - DPMLF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
PAAS - DPMLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
KGC - DPMLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
LUGDF - DPMLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
N/A
TORXF - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCEKF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WRLGF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPMLF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUGDF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More