DPMLF
Price
$22.85
Change
+$0.29 (+1.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
43 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$37.77
Change
+$0.40 (+1.07%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
16B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPMLF vs PAAS

Header iconDPMLF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts DPMLF vs PAASBanner chart's image
DPM Metals
Price$22.85
Change+$0.29 (+1.29%)
Volume$117.71K
Capitalization5.09B
Pan American Silver
Price$37.77
Change+$0.40 (+1.07%)
Volume$7.16M
Capitalization16B
DPMLF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPMLF vs. PAAS commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPMLF is a Hold and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (DPMLF: $22.85 vs. PAAS: $37.77)
Brand notoriety: DPMLF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPMLF: 107% vs. PAAS: 123%
Market capitalization -- DPMLF: $5.09B vs. PAAS: $16B
DPMLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.09B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPMLF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPMLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPMLF is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPMLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPMLF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

DPMLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.61% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2061.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPMLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($16B) has a higher market cap than DPMLF($5.09B). PAAS has higher P/E ratio than DPMLF: PAAS (26.05) vs DPMLF (16.09). DPMLF YTD gains are higher at: 152.181 vs. PAAS (89.110). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. DPMLF (367M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. DPMLF (332M). DPMLF has less debt than PAAS: DPMLF (13.5M) vs PAAS (821M). PAAS has higher revenues than DPMLF: PAAS (3.12B) vs DPMLF (657M).
DPMLFPAASDPMLF / PAAS
Capitalization5.09B16B32%
EBITDA367M1.41B26%
Gain YTD152.18189.110171%
P/E Ratio16.0926.0562%
Revenue657M3.12B21%
Total Cash332M1.11B30%
Total Debt13.5M821M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPMLF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
DPMLF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2577
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
478
SMR RATING
1..100
4668
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as DPMLF (18) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to DPMLF’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (78) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DPMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (68) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DPMLF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DPMLF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

DPMLF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that DPMLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPMLFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFFL9.010.01
+0.10%
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Lvrgd Pref Stk ETN
AGZD22.47-0.01
-0.02%
WisdomTree Interest RtHdgUS Aggt Bd ETF
BWZ27.91-0.03
-0.09%
SPDR® Blmbg ST Intrn TrsBd ETF
HSCZ37.59-0.08
-0.21%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF
ASHR32.01-0.08
-0.25%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF

DPMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPMLF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPMLF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPMLF
1D Price
Change %
DPMLF100%
+1.28%
AEM - DPMLF
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
AGI - DPMLF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
PAAS - DPMLF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
KGC - DPMLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
LUGDF - DPMLF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More