DPBSF
Price
$35.50
Change
+$3.50 (+10.94%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
ZIM
Price
$13.61
Change
-$0.33 (-2.37%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.64B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPBSF vs ZIM

Header iconDPBSF vs ZIM Comparison
Open Charts DPBSF vs ZIMBanner chart's image
Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S
Price$35.50
Change+$3.50 (+10.94%)
Volume$380
Capitalization1.06B
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
Price$13.61
Change-$0.33 (-2.37%)
Volume$25.34K
Capitalization1.64B
DPBSF vs ZIM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPBSF vs. ZIM commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and ZIM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (DPBSF: $35.50 vs. ZIM: $13.61)
Brand notoriety: DPBSF and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPBSF: 122% vs. ZIM: 40%
Market capitalization -- DPBSF: $1.06B vs. ZIM: $1.64B
DPBSF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.06B. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the long-term than ZIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPBSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • ZIM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the short-term than ZIM.

Price Growth

DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was -7.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($1.64B) has a higher market cap than DPBSF($1.06B). DPBSF has higher P/E ratio than ZIM: DPBSF (7.55) vs ZIM (0.82). DPBSF YTD gains are higher at: 21.117 vs. ZIM (-19.121). ZIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.9B vs. DPBSF (188M). ZIM has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. DPBSF (280M). DPBSF has less debt than ZIM: DPBSF (560M) vs ZIM (5.92B). ZIM has higher revenues than DPBSF: ZIM (8.58B) vs DPBSF (3.67B).
DPBSFZIMDPBSF / ZIM
Capitalization1.06B1.64B65%
EBITDA188M3.9B5%
Gain YTD21.117-19.121-110%
P/E Ratio7.550.82923%
Revenue3.67B8.58B43%
Total Cash280M1.77B16%
Total Debt560M5.92B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPBSF: Fundamental Ratings
DPBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
12
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPBSFZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ZIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FANIX52.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Energy I
FSRNX16.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Index
HGXFX17.24N/A
N/A
Hartford Global Impact F
CGVEX27.45N/A
N/A
American Funds Global Insight 529-E
SECUX38.66N/A
N/A
NAA Mid Growth A

DPBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPBSF and HHULF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPBSF and HHULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPBSF
1D Price
Change %
DPBSF100%
N/A
HHULF - DPBSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - DPBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - DPBSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - DPBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
HUPHY - DPBSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
-2.37%
GSL - ZIM
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
DAC - ZIM
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
CMRE - ZIM
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
SB - ZIM
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
NMM - ZIM
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.27%
More