DPBSF
Price
$32.00
Change
+$5.16 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.02B
SLOFF
Price
$3.09
Change
+$1.58 (+104.64%)
Updated
Apr 5 closing price
Capitalization
533.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPBSF vs SLOFF

Header iconDPBSF vs SLOFF Comparison
Open Charts DPBSF vs SLOFFBanner chart's image
Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S
Price$32.00
Change+$5.16 (+19.23%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.02B
Solstad Farstad ASA
Price$3.09
Change+$1.58 (+104.64%)
Volume$120
Capitalization533.16M
DPBSF vs SLOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPBSF vs. SLOFF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and SLOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (DPBSF: $32.00 vs. SLOFF: $3.01)
Brand notoriety: DPBSF and SLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPBSF: 5% vs. SLOFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- DPBSF: $1.02B vs. SLOFF: $533.16M
DPBSF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.02B. SLOFF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $533.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLOFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLOFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the long-term than SLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPBSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DPBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLOFF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.24% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPBSF($1.03B) has a higher market cap than SLOFF($533M). SLOFF has higher P/E ratio than DPBSF: SLOFF (237.91) vs DPBSF (7.27). DPBSF YTD gains are higher at: 9.176 vs. SLOFF (0.000).
DPBSFSLOFFDPBSF / SLOFF
Capitalization1.03B533M192%
EBITDA182MN/A-
Gain YTD9.1760.000-
P/E Ratio7.27237.913%
Revenue3.92BN/A-
Total Cash291MN/A-
Total Debt516MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPBSF vs SLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
DPBSF
SLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
6595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5271
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPBSF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLOFF (91). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLOFF (100). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOFF (95). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew similarly to SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SLOFF (71). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew similarly to SLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

SLOFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as DPBSF (12). This means that SLOFF’s stock grew similarly to DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPBSFSLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
4%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBGIX46.940.20
+0.43%
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth I
CRFIX11.890.03
+0.25%
Calvert Focused Value I
DGFYX31.720.06
+0.19%
Davis Global Y
MCLOX16.570.02
+0.12%
BlackRock Global Allocation Inv C
PABVX15.85-0.02
-0.13%
Principal MidCap Value I R5

DPBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPBSF and HHULF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPBSF and HHULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPBSF
1D Price
Change %
DPBSF100%
N/A
HHULF - DPBSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - DPBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.46%
WTSHF - DPBSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - DPBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
HUPHY - DPBSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLOFF and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLOFF and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLOFF
1D Price
Change %
SLOFF100%
N/A
ZIM - SLOFF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
DPBSF - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEMUF - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTAUY - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - SLOFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More