DPBSF
Price
$35.50
Change
+$3.50 (+10.94%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.07B
SITIY
Price
$40.00
Change
+$3.92 (+10.86%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
9.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPBSF vs SITIY

Header iconDPBSF vs SITIY Comparison
Open Charts DPBSF vs SITIYBanner chart's image
Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S
Price$35.50
Change+$3.50 (+10.94%)
Volume$380
Capitalization1.07B
SITC International Holdings
Price$40.00
Change+$3.92 (+10.86%)
Volume$233
Capitalization9.87B
DPBSF vs SITIY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPBSF vs. SITIY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and SITIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DPBSF: $35.50 vs. SITIY: $40.00)
Brand notoriety: DPBSF and SITIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPBSF: 126% vs. SITIY: 23%
Market capitalization -- DPBSF: $1.07B vs. SITIY: $9.87B
DPBSF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $1.07B. SITIY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $9.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSITIY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SITIY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITIY is a better buy in the long-term than DPBSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPBSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SITIY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SITIY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the short-term than SITIY.

Price Growth

DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SITIY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.03% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITIY($9.87B) has a higher market cap than DPBSF($1.07B). SITIY has higher P/E ratio than DPBSF: SITIY (8.33) vs DPBSF (7.55). SITIY YTD gains are higher at: 94.674 vs. DPBSF (21.117). SITIY has more cash in the bank: 799M vs. DPBSF (280M). SITIY has less debt than DPBSF: SITIY (328M) vs DPBSF (560M).
DPBSFSITIYDPBSF / SITIY
Capitalization1.07B9.87B11%
EBITDA188MN/A-
Gain YTD21.11794.67422%
P/E Ratio7.558.3391%
Revenue3.67BN/A-
Total Cash280M799M35%
Total Debt560M328M171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPBSF vs SITIY: Fundamental Ratings
DPBSF
SITIY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6618
SMR RATING
1..100
6818
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1286
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SITIY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as DPBSF (18). This means that SITIY’s stock grew similarly to DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPBSF (66). This means that SITIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPBSF (68). This means that SITIY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

SITIY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as DPBSF (49). This means that SITIY’s stock grew similarly to DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SITIY (86). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SITIY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPBSFSITIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITIY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEIE30.290.28
+0.92%
SEI Select International Equity ETF
EMO45.160.36
+0.80%
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
AVSD70.840.55
+0.78%
Avantis Responsible International Eq ETF
IBIF26.520.02
+0.06%
iShares iBonds Oct 2029 Term Tips ETF
VWO53.55-0.10
-0.19%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF

DPBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPBSF and HHULF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPBSF and HHULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPBSF
1D Price
Change %
DPBSF100%
N/A
HHULF - DPBSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - DPBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - DPBSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - DPBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
HUPHY - DPBSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SITIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITIY and PTAUY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITIY and PTAUY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITIY
1D Price
Change %
SITIY100%
N/A
PTAUY - SITIY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - SITIY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
ZIM - SITIY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
HUPHY - SITIY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - SITIY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More