DPBSF
Price
$32.00
Change
+$5.16 (+19.23%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
941.15M
PSGFF
Price
$0.18
Change
+$0.12 (+171.43%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
275.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPBSF vs PSGFF

Header iconDPBSF vs PSGFF Comparison
Open Charts DPBSF vs PSGFFBanner chart's image
Dampskibsselskabet Norden A/S
Price$32.00
Change+$5.16 (+19.23%)
Volume$150
Capitalization941.15M
Precious Shipping
Price$0.18
Change+$0.12 (+171.43%)
Volume$1.6K
Capitalization275.34M
DPBSF vs PSGFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPBSF vs. PSGFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and PSGFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DPBSF: $32.00 vs. PSGFF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: DPBSF and PSGFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPBSF: 3% vs. PSGFF: 104%
Market capitalization -- DPBSF: $941.15M vs. PSGFF: $275.34M
DPBSF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $941.15M. PSGFF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $275.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSGFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSGFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the long-term than PSGFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPBSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSGFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PSGFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPBSF is a better buy in the short-term than PSGFF.

Price Growth

DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PSGFF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.18% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPBSF($941M) has a higher market cap than PSGFF($275M). PSGFF has higher P/E ratio than DPBSF: PSGFF (10.18) vs DPBSF (7.27). DPBSF YTD gains are higher at: 9.176 vs. PSGFF (-43.373). PSGFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. DPBSF (182M). PSGFF has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. DPBSF (291M). DPBSF has less debt than PSGFF: DPBSF (516M) vs PSGFF (8.16B). PSGFF has higher revenues than DPBSF: PSGFF (5.54B) vs DPBSF (3.92B).
DPBSFPSGFFDPBSF / PSGFF
Capitalization941M275M342%
EBITDA182M3.08B6%
Gain YTD9.176-43.373-21%
P/E Ratio7.2710.1871%
Revenue3.92B5.54B71%
Total Cash291M1.74B17%
Total Debt516M8.16B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPBSF vs PSGFF: Fundamental Ratings
DPBSF
PSGFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6687
SMR RATING
1..100
6582
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4434
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSGFF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as DPBSF (20). This means that PSGFF’s stock grew similarly to DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as PSGFF (87). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew similarly to PSGFF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PSGFF (82). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew similarly to PSGFF’s over the last 12 months.

PSGFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as DPBSF (44). This means that PSGFF’s stock grew similarly to DPBSF’s over the last 12 months.

DPBSF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PSGFF (71). This means that DPBSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PSGFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPBSFPSGFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSGFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMGVX31.520.41
+1.32%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd I2
SOIVX35.060.32
+0.92%
Spirit of America Large Cap Value Inst
OAKLX83.810.34
+0.41%
Oakmark Select Investor
SFILX15.400.02
+0.13%
Schwab Fundamental Intl Sm Eq Idx
STTIX9.23-0.02
-0.22%
North Square Core Plus Bond I

DPBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPBSF and HHULF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPBSF and HHULF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPBSF
1D Price
Change %
DPBSF100%
N/A
HHULF - DPBSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOIEF - DPBSF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - DPBSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - DPBSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
HUPHY - DPBSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSGFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSGFF and SOIEF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSGFF and SOIEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSGFF
1D Price
Change %
PSGFF100%
N/A
SOIEF - PSGFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUPHY - PSGFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTSHF - PSGFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPBSF - PSGFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIM - PSGFF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
More