Advertisement
DPBSF vs HUPHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPBSF is a Hold and HUPHY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DPBSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHUPHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DPBSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- HUPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DPBSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUPHY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DPBSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- HUPHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
DPBSF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HUPHY (@Marine Shipping) price change was +11.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.05%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+3.12% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| DPBSF | HUPHY | DPBSF / HUPHY | |
| Capitalization | 941M | 1.51B | 62% |
| EBITDA | 182M | 7.04B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 9.176 | 11.122 | 82% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.27 | 20.73 | 35% |
| Revenue | 3.92B | 11.2B | 35% |
| Total Cash | 291M | 8.14B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 516M | 25.3B | 2% |
DPBSF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DPBSF | HUPHY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 29% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 30% | 5 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 22% | 5 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 24% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 13% | 5 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
DPBSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DPBSF and HHULF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPBSF and HHULF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DPBSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPBSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| HHULF - DPBSF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOIEF - DPBSF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WTSHF - DPBSF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZIM - DPBSF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| HUPHY - DPBSF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
HUPHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HUPHY and SOIEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HUPHY and SOIEF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUPHY | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOIEF - HUPHY | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SITIY - HUPHY | 9% Poorly correlated | +7.12% | ||
| SEMUF - HUPHY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSGFF - HUPHY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DPBSF - HUPHY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||