DOLLF
Price
$0.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
HWAUF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

DOLLF vs HWAUF

Header iconDOLLF vs HWAUF Comparison
Open Charts DOLLF vs HWAUFBanner chart's image
Dolly Varden Silver
Price$0.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$363.83K
CapitalizationN/A
Headwater Gold
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.1K
CapitalizationN/A
DOLLF vs HWAUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOLLF vs. HWAUF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOLLF is a Hold and HWAUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (DOLLF: $0.88 vs. HWAUF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: DOLLF and HWAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOLLF: 90% vs. HWAUF: 122%
Market capitalization -- DOLLF: $144.08M vs. HWAUF: $15.96M
DOLLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $144.08M. HWAUF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DOLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOLLF is a better buy in the long-term than HWAUF.

Price Growth

DOLLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while HWAUF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOLLF($144M) has a higher market cap than HWAUF($16M). DOLLF YTD gains are higher at: 34.453 vs. HWAUF (-0.370). HWAUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -910.53K vs. DOLLF (-22.19M). DOLLF has more cash in the bank: 26.7M vs. HWAUF (3.96M). HWAUF has less debt than DOLLF: HWAUF (323K) vs DOLLF (2.07M). DOLLF (0) and HWAUF (0) have equivalent revenues.
DOLLFHWAUFDOLLF / HWAUF
Capitalization144M16M900%
EBITDA-22.19M-910.53K2,438%
Gain YTD34.453-0.370-9,323%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash26.7M3.96M675%
Total Debt2.07M323K640%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOLLF: Fundamental Ratings
DOLLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
34
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

DOLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOLLF has been loosely correlated with SSVRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DOLLF jumps, then SSVRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOLLF
1D Price
Change %
DOLLF100%
+7.41%
SSVRF - DOLLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+4.09%
TORXF - DOLLF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
LGDTF - DOLLF
48%
Loosely correlated
+7.71%
DPMLF - DOLLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
KNTNF - DOLLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More

HWAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWAUF and BKRRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWAUF and BKRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWAUF
1D Price
Change %
HWAUF100%
N/A
BKRRF - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.80%
APGOF - HWAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+12.63%
TORXF - HWAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
DOLLF - HWAUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+7.41%
DDEJF - HWAUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
More