Advertisement
DOC vs MNARF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a Hold and MNARF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNARF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DOC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNARF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNARF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DOC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- MNARF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DOC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while MNARF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
DOC is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-0.77% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
@Media Conglomerates (+1.36% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| DOC | MNARF | DOC / MNARF | |
| Capitalization | 11.1B | 658M | 1,687% |
| EBITDA | 1.52B | 203M | 750% |
| Gain YTD | -16.449 | 6.516 | -252% |
| P/E Ratio | 77.25 | 4.99 | 1,549% |
| Revenue | 2.8B | 354M | 791% |
| Total Cash | 91M | 77.5M | 117% |
| Total Debt | 9.43B | 1.79B | 526% |
DOC | MNARF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 81 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 18 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MNARF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (22) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
MNARF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as DOC (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that MNARF’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.
DOC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for MNARF (87) in the null industry. This means that DOC’s stock grew significantly faster than MNARF’s over the last 12 months.
| DOC | MNARF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 32% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 56% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 27% |
Advertisement
DOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOC has been closely correlated with IRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOC jumps, then IRT could also see price increases.
MNARF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MNARF and BSRTF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNARF and BSRTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNARF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNARF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BSRTF - MNARF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| DOC - MNARF | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.58% | ||
| JRFIF - MNARF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MAC - MNARF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| DHC - MNARF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.40% | ||
More | ||||