DOC
Price
$16.45
Change
-$2.00 (-10.84%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KIM
Price
$20.90
Change
-$0.33 (-1.55%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
14.15B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DOC vs KIM

Header iconDOC vs KIM Comparison
Open Charts DOC vs KIMBanner chart's image
Healthpeak Properties
Price$16.45
Change-$2.00 (-10.84%)
Volume$19.36M
Capitalization11.43B
Kimco Realty
Price$20.90
Change-$0.33 (-1.55%)
Volume$5.85M
Capitalization14.15B
DOC vs KIM Comparison Chart in %
DOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOC vs. KIM commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a StrongBuy and KIM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (DOC: $16.45 vs. KIM: $20.90)
Brand notoriety: DOC and KIM are both not notable
DOC represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while KIM is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOC: 216% vs. KIM: 117%
Market capitalization -- DOC: $11.43B vs. KIM: $14.15B
DOC [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $11.43B. KIM’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $14.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $128.69B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $9.7B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKIM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the long-term than KIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KIM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

DOC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -7.11% price change this week, while KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

KIM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+0.99% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.15% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($14.2B) has a higher market cap than DOC($11.4B). DOC has higher P/E ratio than KIM: DOC (164.50) vs KIM (25.18). KIM YTD gains are higher at: 3.108 vs. DOC (2.897). DOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. KIM (1.42B). KIM has less debt than DOC: KIM (8.35B) vs DOC (9.43B). DOC has higher revenues than KIM: DOC (2.8B) vs KIM (2.12B).
DOCKIMDOC / KIM
Capitalization11.4B14.2B80%
EBITDA1.52B1.42B107%
Gain YTD2.8973.10893%
P/E Ratio164.5025.18653%
Revenue2.8B2.12B132%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.43B8.35B113%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOC vs KIM: Fundamental Ratings
DOC
KIM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7911
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
9084
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
489
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KIM's Valuation (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (77). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOC (100). This means that KIM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOC’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's SMR Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (90). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (57). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

DOC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for KIM (89). This means that DOC’s stock grew significantly faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCKIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTU56.306.68
+13.46%
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X Shares
JULW39.31-0.08
-0.20%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Jul ETF
SIXG66.55-0.25
-0.38%
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF
GSEW87.32-0.40
-0.46%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
STXD37.53-0.35
-0.91%
Strive 1000 Dividend Growth ETF

DOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOC has been closely correlated with IRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOC jumps, then IRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOC
1D Price
Change %
DOC100%
-2.78%
IRT - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
KIM - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
AVB - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
GLPI - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
FRT - DOC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with FRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then FRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
+0.34%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
BRX - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
KRG - KIM
84%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
AKR - KIM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
IVT - KIM
80%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More