DOC
Price
$16.45
Change
-$2.00 (-10.84%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRT
Price
$100.36
Change
+$3.20 (+3.29%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.66B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DOC vs FRT

Header iconDOC vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts DOC vs FRTBanner chart's image
Healthpeak Properties
Price$16.45
Change-$2.00 (-10.84%)
Volume$19.36M
Capitalization11.43B
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$100.36
Change+$3.20 (+3.29%)
Volume$720.64K
Capitalization8.66B
DOC vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
DOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DOC vs. FRT commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DOC is a StrongBuy and FRT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (DOC: $16.45 vs. FRT: $100.36)
Brand notoriety: DOC and FRT are both not notable
DOC represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while FRT is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DOC: 216% vs. FRT: 100%
Market capitalization -- DOC: $11.43B vs. FRT: $8.66B
DOC [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $11.43B. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $128.69B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $9.7B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DOC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DOC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DOC is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DOC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DOC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than DOC.

Price Growth

DOC (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -7.11% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

DOC is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+0.99% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.15% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DOC($11.4B) has a higher market cap than FRT($8.66B). DOC has higher P/E ratio than FRT: DOC (164.50) vs FRT (25.47). DOC YTD gains are higher at: 2.897 vs. FRT (0.692). DOC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. FRT (895M). FRT has less debt than DOC: FRT (4.81B) vs DOC (9.43B). DOC has higher revenues than FRT: DOC (2.8B) vs FRT (1.25B).
DOCFRTDOC / FRT
Capitalization11.4B8.66B132%
EBITDA1.52B895M170%
Gain YTD2.8970.692419%
P/E Ratio164.5025.47646%
Revenue2.8B1.25B223%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt9.43B4.81B196%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DOC vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
DOC
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7975
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
9066
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
472
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DOC's Valuation (77) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (77). This means that DOC’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DOC (100). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's SMR Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (90). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as DOC (57). This means that FRT’s stock grew similarly to DOC’s over the last 12 months.

DOC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRT (72). This means that DOC’s stock grew significantly faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DOCFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMCZ50.700.11
+0.21%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF
FTSD90.93-0.04
-0.04%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF
NTSX55.05-0.54
-0.97%
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
DRUP59.68-2.33
-3.76%
GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF
BULX5.06-0.20
-3.83%
GraniteShares 2x Long BULL Daily ETF

DOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOC has been closely correlated with IRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOC jumps, then IRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DOC
1D Price
Change %
DOC100%
-2.78%
IRT - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
KIM - DOC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
AVB - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
GLPI - DOC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
FRT - DOC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
+0.03%
KIM - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
KRG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.96%
BRX - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
REG - FRT
83%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More