DNZOF
Price
$15.04
Change
-$0.05 (-0.33%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
39.13B
MBLY
Price
$14.03
Change
-$0.47 (-3.24%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.42B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNZOF vs MBLY

Header iconDNZOF vs MBLY Comparison
Open Charts DNZOF vs MBLYBanner chart's image
Denso
Price$15.04
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
Volume$418
Capitalization39.13B
Mobileye Global
Price$14.03
Change-$0.47 (-3.24%)
Volume$3.74M
Capitalization11.42B
DNZOF vs MBLY Comparison Chart in %
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNZOF vs. MBLY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNZOF is a Hold and MBLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (DNZOF: $15.04 vs. MBLY: $14.03)
Brand notoriety: DNZOF and MBLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNZOF: 23% vs. MBLY: 73%
Market capitalization -- DNZOF: $39.13B vs. MBLY: $11.42B
DNZOF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $39.13B. MBLY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $11.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $86.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNZOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMBLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MBLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the long-term than MBLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNZOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNZOF is a better buy in the short-term than MBLY.

Price Growth

DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.99% price change this week, while MBLY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.74% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($39.1B) has a higher market cap than MBLY($11.4B). DNZOF YTD gains are higher at: 1.622 vs. MBLY (-29.568). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 980B vs. MBLY (-2.51B). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 1.1T vs. MBLY (1.71B). DNZOF has higher revenues than MBLY: DNZOF (7.16T) vs MBLY (1.92B).
DNZOFMBLYDNZOF / MBLY
Capitalization39.1B11.4B343%
EBITDA980B-2.51B-39,044%
Gain YTD1.622-29.568-5%
P/E Ratio15.66N/A-
Revenue7.16T1.92B373,021%
Total Cash1.1T1.71B64,307%
Total Debt699BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNZOF vs MBLY: Fundamental Ratings
DNZOF
MBLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
196
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNZOF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBLY (60) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as MBLY (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBLY (96) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MBLY (50) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MBLY (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MBLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNZOFMBLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWFG53.240.17
+0.32%
NYLI Winslow Focused Large Cap Gr ETF
BILZ101.000.04
+0.04%
PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active ETF
PTIR30.420.01
+0.03%
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
CGIE34.10N/A
N/A
Capital Group International Equity ETF
AIFD36.02-0.07
-0.20%
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
-0.33%
CTTAF - DNZOF
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.52%
DNZOY - DNZOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
DAN - DNZOF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
MBLY - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
MNRO - DNZOF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
More

MBLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBLY has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBLY jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBLY
1D Price
Change %
MBLY100%
-3.24%
BWA - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
VC - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.57%
LEA - MBLY
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
ALV - MBLY
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
MGA - MBLY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
More