DNZOF
Price
$13.70
Change
-$0.69 (-4.79%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
52.56B
HLLGY
Price
$47.50
Change
+$0.95 (+2.04%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
8.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNZOF vs HLLGY

Header iconDNZOF vs HLLGY Comparison
Open Charts DNZOF vs HLLGYBanner chart's image
Denso
Price$13.70
Change-$0.69 (-4.79%)
Volume$569
Capitalization52.56B
Hella Gmbh & Co Kgaa
Price$47.50
Change+$0.95 (+2.04%)
Volume$250
Capitalization8.83B
DNZOF vs HLLGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNZOF vs. HLLGY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNZOF is a Hold and HLLGY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DNZOF: $13.70 vs. HLLGY: $46.96)
Brand notoriety: DNZOF and HLLGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNZOF: 25% vs. HLLGY: 100%
Market capitalization -- DNZOF: $52.56B vs. HLLGY: $8.83B
DNZOF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $52.56B. HLLGY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $8.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNZOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLLGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DNZOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLLGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DNZOF and HLLGY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNZOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLLGY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNZOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLLGY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DNZOF and HLLGY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DNZOF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while HLLGY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.35% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNZOF($52.6B) has a higher market cap than HLLGY($8.83B). HLLGY has higher P/E ratio than DNZOF: HLLGY (35.59) vs DNZOF (23.36). HLLGY YTD gains are higher at: 2.041 vs. DNZOF (-7.432). DNZOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 835B vs. HLLGY (752M). DNZOF has more cash in the bank: 768B vs. HLLGY (1.06B). DNZOF has higher revenues than HLLGY: DNZOF (6.4T) vs HLLGY (7.11B).
DNZOFHLLGYDNZOF / HLLGY
Capitalization52.6B8.83B596%
EBITDA835B752M111,037%
Gain YTD-7.4322.041-364%
P/E Ratio23.3635.5966%
Revenue6.4T7.11B90,079%
Total Cash768B1.06B72,180%
Total Debt889BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNZOF vs HLLGY: Fundamental Ratings
DNZOF
HLLGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
676
SMR RATING
1..100
168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNZOF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HLLGY (36). This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

HLLGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNZOF (67). This means that HLLGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLLGY (68). This means that DNZOF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

DNZOF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as HLLGY (57). This means that DNZOF’s stock grew similarly to HLLGY’s over the last 12 months.

HLLGY's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as DNZOF (93). This means that HLLGY’s stock grew similarly to DNZOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNZOFHLLGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNZOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLLGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLBR18.260.26
+1.42%
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
VOTE73.590.63
+0.86%
TCW Transform 500 ETF
ZSC23.25N/A
N/A
USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy
HISF44.60-0.10
-0.21%
First Trust High Income Strat Foc ETF
TLT86.97-0.61
-0.70%
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

DNZOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNZOF and CTTAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNZOF and CTTAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNZOF
1D Price
Change %
DNZOF100%
-4.79%
CTTAF - DNZOF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
DNZOY - DNZOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
EXCOF - DNZOF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMMCF - DNZOF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRDCY - DNZOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
More

HLLGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLLGY and THRM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLLGY and THRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLLGY
1D Price
Change %
HLLGY100%
N/A
THRM - HLLGY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
KNDI - HLLGY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.67%
FURCF - HLLGY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNZOY - HLLGY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
DNZOF - HLLGY
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
More