Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$15.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.9M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. DNSVX (93.9M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.61) vs SSGSX (0.48). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX (-8.48) and DNSVX (-8.57) have marching annual gain over last year. DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 27.15 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.628 | -1.034 | -448% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 5.31B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.57 | -8.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.43 | 1.10 | 677% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.15 | 18.06 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.55 | 18.76 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement