Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$15.73
Change-$0.22 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.19M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. DNSVX (96.2M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.61) vs SSGSX (0.49). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). DNSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.62 vs. SSGSX (-12.62). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 21.51 vs. SSGSX (8.71).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.975 | -0.129 | -5,398% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.2M | 5.23B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.49 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.62 | -12.62 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.73 | -6.25 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.51 | 8.71 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.62 | 20.45 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement