Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$15.75
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.08M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. DNSVX (107M). DNSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: DNSVX (0.61) vs SSGSX (0.47). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. DNSVX (-3.05). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 32.56 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.701 | 2.046 | 279% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 5.64B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.47 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.05 | -1.56 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.91 | 3.97 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.56 | 22.95 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.67 | 24.71 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement