Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSVX vs SSGSX
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts DNSVX vs SSGSX
Dunham Small Cap Value N
Price$16.84
Change+$1.14 (+7.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.98M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
DNSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. DNSVX (94M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than DNSVX: SSGSX (0.58) vs DNSVX (0.50). DNSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: DNSVX (21 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and DNSVX (1.22) have similar cost to investors . DNSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. SSGSX (50.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSVX: SSGSX (2500) vs DNSVX (100000). DNSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. SSGSX (3.83). DNSVX return over 5 years is better than : 9.18 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| DNSVX | SSGSX | DNSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.23 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.23 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.138 | 8.123 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 5.04B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.58 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 3.83 | 337% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.06 | -3.10 | -324% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.18 | -0.23 | -4,053% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.99 | 53.01 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement