Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$27.92
Change-$0.23 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.18B vs. WCMNX (44.6M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (1.05) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. WCMNX (7.04). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 14.90 vs. WCMNX (-5.40).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.418 | 9.062 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 44.6M | 2,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.61 | 7.04 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.75 | 32.95 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.90 | -5.40 | -276% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement