Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$25.65
Change-$1.36 (-5.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.49
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. WCMNX (43.1M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (1.05) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. WCMNX (3.45).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.526 | 6.304 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 43.1M | 2,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | -3.16 | -201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.14 | 22.08 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.83 | 3.45 | 778% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement