Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMNX
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMNX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$27.33
Change+$0.47 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.84
Change+$0.25 (+1.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
DNSMX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. WCMNX (43M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: DNSMX (1.12) vs WCMNX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMNX (1000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.39 vs. WCMNX (1.42). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 27.90 vs. WCMNX (11.12).
| DNSMX | WCMNX | DNSMX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.24 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.04 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.885 | 7.092 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.2B | 43M | 2,791% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.39 | 1.42 | 804% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.29 | 32.97 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.90 | 11.12 | 251% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement