Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMLX
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMLX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$26.94
Change-$0.14 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: DNSMX (1.05) vs WCMLX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 18.17 vs. WCMLX (1.99).
| DNSMX | WCMLX | DNSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.825 | 7.621 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 44.4M | 2,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | -1.14 | -490% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.24 | 21.83 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 1.99 | 913% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |