Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNSMX vs WCMLX
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts DNSMX vs WCMLX
Driehaus Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$25.65
Change-$1.36 (-5.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.06M
DNSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSMX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. WCMLX (43.1M). DNSMX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: DNSMX (1.05) vs WCMLX (0.00). DNSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: DNSMX (8 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than DNSMX (0.70). DNSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs DNSMX (500000). DNSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). DNSMX return over 5 years is better than : 26.83 vs. WCMLX (4.74).
| DNSMX | WCMLX | DNSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.99 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.79 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.526 | 6.454 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 100000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 43.1M | 2,564% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | -2.98 | -213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.14 | 22.89 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.83 | 4.74 | 566% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement