DNSKF
Price
$35.00
Change
+$0.79 (+2.31%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
20.43B
FBP
Price
$21.93
Change
+$0.26 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.93B
15 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNSKF vs FBP

Header iconDNSKF vs FBP Comparison
Open Charts DNSKF vs FBPBanner chart's image
Danske Bank A/S
Price$35.00
Change+$0.79 (+2.31%)
Volume$213
Capitalization20.43B
First Ban
Price$21.93
Change+$0.26 (+1.20%)
Volume$500.44K
Capitalization2.93B
DNSKF vs FBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNSKF vs. FBP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSKF is a Hold and FBP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DNSKF: $35.00 vs. FBP: $21.93)
Brand notoriety: DNSKF and FBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNSKF: 99% vs. FBP: 48%
Market capitalization -- DNSKF: $20.43B vs. FBP: $2.93B
DNSKF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.43B. FBP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNSKF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFBP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FBP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the long-term than DNSKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNSKF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the short-term than FBP.

Price Growth

DNSKF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBP (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than FBP($2.94B). DNSKF has higher P/E ratio than FBP: DNSKF (312.50) vs FBP (10.12). FBP YTD gains are higher at: 20.100 vs. DNSKF (18.004). FBP has less debt than DNSKF: FBP (662M) vs DNSKF (1.06T). DNSKF has higher revenues than FBP: DNSKF (52.3B) vs FBP (897M).
DNSKFFBPDNSKF / FBP
Capitalization20.4B2.94B695%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.00420.10090%
P/E Ratio312.5010.123,087%
Revenue52.3B897M5,831%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.06T662M160,725%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNSKF vs FBP: Fundamental Ratings
DNSKF
FBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
211
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6539
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNSKF's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FBP (91) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FBP (7) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as FBP (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DNSKF (50) in the null industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as DNSKF (65) in the null industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNSKFFBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTRX203.142.87
+1.43%
Franklin DynaTech R6
JAWGX74.660.60
+0.81%
Janus Henderson VIT Global Rsrch Instl
RLUSX17.410.12
+0.69%
Lazard US Equity Focus R6
LGMAX25.770.09
+0.35%
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation A
HNCTX21.02-0.02
-0.10%
Hartford International Growth R5

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNSKF has been loosely correlated with CRZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNSKF jumps, then CRZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
CRZY - DNSKF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALBKF - DNSKF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OFG - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
FBP - DNSKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

FBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBP has been closely correlated with BPOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBP jumps, then BPOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBP
1D Price
Change %
FBP100%
+1.20%
BPOP - FBP
87%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
WSFS - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
HWC - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
ABCB - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
FFBC - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More