DNSKF
Price
$42.98
Change
-$1.82 (-4.06%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
33.21B
EFSC
Price
$60.67
Change
-$0.51 (-0.83%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.24B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNSKF vs EFSC

Header iconDNSKF vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts DNSKF vs EFSCBanner chart's image
Danske Bank A/S
Price$42.98
Change-$1.82 (-4.06%)
Volume$300
Capitalization33.21B
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.67
Change-$0.51 (-0.83%)
Volume$139.34K
Capitalization2.24B
DNSKF vs EFSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNSKF vs. EFSC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNSKF is a Hold and EFSC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DNSKF: $42.97 vs. EFSC: $60.67)
Brand notoriety: DNSKF and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNSKF: 141% vs. EFSC: 89%
Market capitalization -- DNSKF: $33.21B vs. EFSC: $2.24B
DNSKF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $33.21B. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNSKF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than DNSKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNSKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than DNSKF.

Price Growth

DNSKF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($33.2B) has a higher market cap than EFSC($2.24B). EFSC has higher P/E ratio than DNSKF: EFSC (11.53) vs DNSKF (9.86). DNSKF YTD gains are higher at: 44.892 vs. EFSC (8.769). EFSC has less debt than DNSKF: EFSC (661M) vs DNSKF (1.12T). DNSKF has higher revenues than EFSC: DNSKF (56.3B) vs EFSC (552M).
DNSKFEFSCDNSKF / EFSC
Capitalization33.2B2.24B1,480%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD44.8928.769512%
P/E Ratio9.8611.5385%
Revenue56.3B552M10,199%
Total CashN/A260M-
Total Debt1.12T661M169,289%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNSKF vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
DNSKF
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
630
SMR RATING
1..100
215
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNSKF (95) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNSKFEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVLU4.010.13
+3.35%
Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings Inc
CLAR3.660.03
+0.83%
Clarus Corp
CHD95.800.57
+0.60%
Church & Dwight Co
FCBC37.56-0.52
-1.37%
First Community Bankshares
CBU59.92-0.90
-1.48%
Community Financial System Inc

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNSKF has been loosely correlated with CRZY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNSKF jumps, then CRZY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
CRZY - DNSKF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STBK - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OFG - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
FBP - DNSKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
EFSC - DNSKF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
-0.83%
WSFS - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
GABC - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.93%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
More