DNQAF
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.51 (+4.42%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
31.53M
FGMCU
Price
$10.20
Change
-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNQAF vs FGMCU

Header iconDNQAF vs FGMCU Comparison
Open Charts DNQAF vs FGMCUBanner chart's image
Denali Capital Acquisition
Price$12.05
Change+$0.51 (+4.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization31.53M
FG Merger II
Price$10.20
Change-$0.04 (-0.39%)
Volume$238
CapitalizationN/A
DNQAF vs FGMCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNQAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNQAF vs. FGMCU commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNQAF is a StrongBuy and FGMCU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (DNQAF: $12.05 vs. FGMCU: $10.20)
Brand notoriety: DNQAF and FGMCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNQAF: 22% vs. FGMCU: 3%
Market capitalization -- DNQAF: $31.53M vs. FGMCU: $0
DNQAF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $31.53M. FGMCU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.03M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNQAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFGMCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNQAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the long-term than DNQAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNQAF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGMCU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNQAF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the short-term than DNQAF.

Price Growth

DNQAF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.10% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMCU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -234.06K vs. DNQAF (-1.35M). FGMCU has more cash in the bank: 518K vs. DNQAF (126). FGMCU has less debt than DNQAF: FGMCU (286K) vs DNQAF (2.99M). DNQAF (0) and FGMCU (0) have equivalent revenues.
DNQAFFGMCUDNQAF / FGMCU
Capitalization31.5MN/A-
EBITDA-1.35M-234.06K578%
Gain YTD1.431N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash126518K0%
Total Debt2.99M286K1,045%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNQAFFGMCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
18%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
28%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
6%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
5%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
24%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNQAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CJEWF1.90N/A
N/A
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Limited
RTOXF4.20N/A
N/A
Rotork PLC
TWIRF1.86N/A
N/A
Tree Island Steel Ltd.
CBUTD0.04N/A
N/A
CLEAR BLUE TECHNOLOGIES INTL INC.
VHIBF8.45-0.03
-0.35%
VITALHUB CORP

DNQAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNQAF has been loosely correlated with FORLU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNQAF jumps, then FORLU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNQAF
1D Price
Change %
DNQAF100%
N/A
FORLU - DNQAF
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.90%
CRTUF - DNQAF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNQUF - DNQAF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALCYU - DNQAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
FGMCU - DNQAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMCU has been closely correlated with EVCOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FGMCU jumps, then EVCOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
-0.39%
EVCOU - FGMCU
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
MACI - FGMCU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMV - FGMCU
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPOD - FGMCU
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATMC - FGMCU
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More