It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNPCF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileEXPGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNPCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EXPGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
DNPCF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EXPGF (@Data Processing Services) price change was -9.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.52%.
EXPGF is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.
Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Data Processing Services (-3.68% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| DNPCF | EXPGF | DNPCF / EXPGF | |
| Capitalization | 8.34B | 34.2B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 228B | 2.83B | 8,045% |
| Gain YTD | 4.988 | -24.315 | -21% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.78 | 23.44 | 50% |
| Revenue | 1.44T | 7.97B | 18,067% |
| Total Cash | 291B | 129M | 225,581% |
| Total Debt | 155B | 5.63B | 2,756% |
DNPCF | EXPGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EXPGF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as DNPCF (31). This means that EXPGF’s stock grew similarly to DNPCF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EXPGF (100). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew significantly faster than EXPGF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPCF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EXPGF (79). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew significantly faster than EXPGF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EXPGF (84). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EXPGF’s over the last 12 months.
DNPCF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EXPGF (90). This means that DNPCF’s stock grew significantly faster than EXPGF’s over the last 12 months.
| DNPCF | EXPGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 23% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 19% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 45% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 44% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXS | 1.97 | 0.12 | +6.49% |
| Direxion Daily Semicondct Bear 3X ETF | |||
| VIXY | 26.37 | 1.09 | +4.31% |
| ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures | |||
| JIII | 50.39 | -0.04 | -0.08% |
| Janus Henderson Income ETF | |||
| RND | 29.73 | -0.60 | -1.98% |
| First Trust Bloomberg R&D Leaders ETF | |||
| FDFF | 33.67 | -1.30 | -3.72% |
| Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNPCF and SOMLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNPCF and SOMLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNPCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNPCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SOMLF - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NSYC - DNPCF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DNPLY - DNPCF | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| EXPGF - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | -7.51% | ||
| EXPGY - DNPCF | 0% Poorly correlated | -6.53% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXPGF has been loosely correlated with EXPGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EXPGF jumps, then EXPGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EXPGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPGF | 100% | -7.51% | ||
| EXPGY - EXPGF | 59% Loosely correlated | -6.53% | ||
| ASAZY - EXPGF | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| CPRT - EXPGF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.86% | ||
| RELX - EXPGF | 26% Poorly correlated | -14.13% | ||
| BMBLF - EXPGF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||