Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLCX vs VIMSX
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
Price$53.02
Change+$0.40 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets476.38M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.52
Change+$0.46 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. DNLCX (476M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: VIMSX (1.40) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: DNLCX (23 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). DNLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.78 vs. VIMSX (16.00). DNLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: DNLCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. DNLCX (6.54). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 73.64 vs. DNLCX (24.74).
| DNLCX | VIMSX | DNLCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.17 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.17 | 1,224% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.783 | 7.625 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 476M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 17.63 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.68 | 43.06 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.74 | 73.64 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.00 | 127.44 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement