Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLCX vs VIMSX
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
Price$54.87
Change+$0.28 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets477.89M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.77
Change+$0.62 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. DNLCX (478M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: VIMSX (1.37) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: DNLCX (23 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). DNLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.78 vs. VIMSX (16.00). DNLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: DNLCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.45 vs. DNLCX (-5.92). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. DNLCX (7.48).
| DNLCX | VIMSX | DNLCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.17 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.17 | 1,224% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.202 | 9.959 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 478M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.92 | 2.45 | -241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.28 | 34.53 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.48 | 44.85 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.42 | 138.83 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement