Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNLCX vs VIMSX
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts DNLCX vs VIMSX
BNY Mellon Active MidCap C
Price$53.97
Change-$0.85 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets472.05M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$78.42
Change-$1.34 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.55B
DNLCX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNLCX vs. VIMSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNLCX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. DNLCX (472M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than DNLCX: VIMSX (1.38) vs DNLCX (0.00). DNLCX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: DNLCX (23 years) vs VIMSX (28 years). DNLCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). DNLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.78 vs. VIMSX (16.00). DNLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: DNLCX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.67 vs. DNLCX (-3.60). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. DNLCX (12.26).
| DNLCX | VIMSX | DNLCX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.17 | 1,029% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.08 | 0.17 | 1,224% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.340 | 10.764 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.60 | 5.67 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.69 | 37.82 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.26 | 52.23 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.57 | 148.83 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement