DNIYY
Price
$33.48
Change
-$1.00 (-2.90%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.07B
SULZF
Price
$199.35
Change
+$22.03 (+12.42%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
6.44B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNIYY vs SULZF

Header iconDNIYY vs SULZF Comparison
Open Charts DNIYY vs SULZFBanner chart's image
Danieli S.p.A.- Officine Meccaniche Danieli & C
Price$33.48
Change-$1.00 (-2.90%)
Volume$118
Capitalization3.07B
Sulzer AG
Price$199.35
Change+$22.03 (+12.42%)
Volume$1
Capitalization6.44B
DNIYY vs SULZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNIYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SULZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNIYY vs. SULZF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNIYY is a StrongBuy and SULZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (DNIYY: $33.48 vs. SULZF: $199.35)
Brand notoriety: DNIYY and SULZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNIYY: 25% vs. SULZF: 24%
Market capitalization -- DNIYY: $3.07B vs. SULZF: $6.44B
DNIYY [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $3.07B. SULZF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $6.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $213.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNIYY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSULZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DNIYY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SULZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SULZF is a better buy in the long-term than DNIYY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNIYY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SULZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNIYY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SULZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SULZF is a better buy in the short-term than DNIYY.

Price Growth

DNIYY (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SULZF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +12.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+1.00% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SULZF($6.44B) has a higher market cap than DNIYY($3.07B). SULZF has higher P/E ratio than DNIYY: SULZF (20.11) vs DNIYY (7.90). SULZF YTD gains are higher at: 41.584 vs. DNIYY (16.320).
DNIYYSULZFDNIYY / SULZF
Capitalization3.07B6.44B48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.32041.58439%
P/E Ratio7.9020.1139%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNIYY vs SULZF: Fundamental Ratings
DNIYY
SULZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3341
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1149
SMR RATING
1..100
7351
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SULZF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNIYY (94). This means that SULZF’s stock grew significantly faster than DNIYY’s over the last 12 months.

DNIYY's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SULZF (49). This means that DNIYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SULZF’s over the last 12 months.

SULZF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as DNIYY (73). This means that SULZF’s stock grew similarly to DNIYY’s over the last 12 months.

SULZF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as DNIYY (46). This means that SULZF’s stock grew similarly to DNIYY’s over the last 12 months.

SULZF's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as DNIYY (42). This means that SULZF’s stock grew similarly to DNIYY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNIYYSULZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNIYY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SULZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LITP8.070.21
+2.63%
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
AOHY11.160.01
+0.04%
Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF
CGUI25.310.01
+0.03%
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
FIXD43.88-0.05
-0.11%
First Trust Smith Opportnstc Fxd Inc ETF
ETB14.72-0.05
-0.37%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund

DNIYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNIYY and JBTM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNIYY and JBTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNIYY
1D Price
Change %
DNIYY100%
N/A
JBTM - DNIYY
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
SULZF - DNIYY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRAWA - DNIYY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
SREMF - DNIYY
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.70%
CHSTF - DNIYY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SULZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SULZF and MCRUF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SULZF and MCRUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SULZF
1D Price
Change %
SULZF100%
N/A
MCRUF - SULZF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNIYY - SULZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMGKF - SULZF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXSY - SULZF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
TOMZ - SULZF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
More