DNGDF
Price
$3.19
Change
-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
87.94M
50 days until earnings call
MMTMF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
36.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNGDF vs MMTMF

Header iconDNGDF vs MMTMF Comparison
Open Charts DNGDF vs MMTMFBanner chart's image
Dynacor Group
Price$3.19
Change-$0.08 (-2.45%)
Volume$12.4K
Capitalization87.94M
Monument Mining
Price$0.28
Change-$0.01 (-3.45%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization36.12M
DNGDF vs MMTMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNGDF vs. MMTMF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNGDF is a Hold and MMTMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DNGDF: $3.19 vs. MMTMF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: DNGDF and MMTMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNGDF: 197% vs. MMTMF: 51%
Market capitalization -- DNGDF: $87.94M vs. MMTMF: $36.12M
DNGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $87.94M. MMTMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMMTMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DNGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MMTMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the long-term than DNGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNGDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMTMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNGDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MMTMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMTMF is a better buy in the short-term than DNGDF.

Price Growth

DNGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.69% price change this week, while MMTMF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

DNGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNGDF($87.9M) has a higher market cap than MMTMF($36.1M). MMTMF YTD gains are higher at: 52.703 vs. DNGDF (-18.465). DNGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.9M vs. MMTMF (-2.04M). DNGDF has more cash in the bank: 30.2M vs. MMTMF (9.81M). MMTMF has less debt than DNGDF: MMTMF (315K) vs DNGDF (688K). DNGDF has higher revenues than MMTMF: DNGDF (204M) vs MMTMF (10.1M).
DNGDFMMTMFDNGDF / MMTMF
Capitalization87.9M36.1M243%
EBITDA21.9M-2.04M-1,076%
Gain YTD-18.46552.703-35%
P/E Ratio8.18N/A-
Revenue204M10.1M2,020%
Total Cash30.2M9.81M308%
Total Debt688K315K218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNGDF vs MMTMF: Fundamental Ratings
DNGDF
MMTMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3424
SMR RATING
1..100
5349
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DNGDF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MMTMF (85). This means that DNGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as DNGDF (34). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as DNGDF (53). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew similarly to DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

MMTMF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNGDF (80). This means that MMTMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNGDF’s over the last 12 months.

DNGDF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as MMTMF (98). This means that DNGDF’s stock grew similarly to MMTMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNGDFMMTMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMTMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNHIX26.490.19
+0.72%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I
PREFX79.720.47
+0.59%
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity
PGTIX22.940.09
+0.39%
T. Rowe Price Global Technology I
WVMIX11.390.02
+0.18%
William Blair Mid Cap Value I
NESIX19.11-0.03
-0.16%
Needham Small Cap Growth Institutional

DNGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNGDF and ORAAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNGDF and ORAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNGDF
1D Price
Change %
DNGDF100%
-2.51%
ORAAF - DNGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
MMTMF - DNGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
BONXF - DNGDF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
ECRFF - DNGDF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
DNCVF - DNGDF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
More

MMTMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMTMF has been loosely correlated with GSISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMTMF jumps, then GSISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMTMF
1D Price
Change %
MMTMF100%
-2.62%
GSISF - MMTMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSRCF - MMTMF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORAAF - MMTMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
TEUTF - MMTMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
DNGDF - MMTMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
More