Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DNEMX vs RNWBX
DNEMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts DNEMX vs RNWBX
Dunham Emerging Markets Stock N
Price$17.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.4M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
DNEMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DNEMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNEMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. DNEMX (130M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than DNEMX: RNWBX (0.12) vs DNEMX (0.11). DNEMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: DNEMX (21 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than DNEMX (1.26). DNEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than DNEMX: RNWBX (250) vs DNEMX (100000). DNEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.90 vs. RNWBX (18.78). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. DNEMX (-2.56).
| DNEMX | RNWBX | DNEMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.634 | 24.772 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 50000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.12 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.90 | 18.78 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.69 | 40.66 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.56 | 14.40 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.80 | 87.08 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement