DNBBY
Price
$27.39
Change
+$0.91 (+3.44%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
39.92B
24 days until earnings call
LRCDF
Price
$24.13
Change
-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNBBY vs LRCDF

Header iconDNBBY vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts DNBBY vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
DNB ASA
Price$27.39
Change+$0.91 (+3.44%)
Volume$29.57K
Capitalization39.92B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$24.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Volume$62.55K
Capitalization1.05B
DNBBY vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNBBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNBBY vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNBBY is a StrongBuy and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (DNBBY: $27.39 vs. LRCDF: $24.13)
Brand notoriety: DNBBY and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNBBY: 92% vs. LRCDF: 557%
Market capitalization -- DNBBY: $39.92B vs. LRCDF: $1.05B
DNBBY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $39.92B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNBBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DNBBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both DNBBY and LRCDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNBBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNBBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both DNBBY and LRCDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

DNBBY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.14% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

DNBBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNBBY($39.9B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.05B). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than DNBBY: LRCDF (11.00) vs DNBBY (9.12). DNBBY YTD gains are higher at: 46.599 vs. LRCDF (20.831). LRCDF has less debt than DNBBY: LRCDF (15.6B) vs DNBBY (1.04T). DNBBY has higher revenues than LRCDF: DNBBY (87.3B) vs LRCDF (975M).
DNBBYLRCDFDNBBY / LRCDF
Capitalization39.9B1.05B3,815%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD46.59920.831224%
P/E Ratio9.1211.0083%
Revenue87.3B975M8,954%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.04T15.6B6,635%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNBBYLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNBBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTRRX8.140.07
+0.87%
Royce Small-Cap Total Return R
IBGIX19.860.17
+0.86%
VY® Baron Growth I
ALPCX11.130.09
+0.82%
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val C
WCMVX20.230.13
+0.65%
WCM Focused International Equity Ins
RGLBX27.080.16
+0.59%
American Funds Global Insight R-2

DNBBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNBBY has been loosely correlated with DNBBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNBBY jumps, then DNBBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNBBY
1D Price
Change %
DNBBY100%
+3.44%
DNBBF - DNBBY
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
NRDBY - DNBBY
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
SWDBY - DNBBY
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.45%
ISNPY - DNBBY
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
CKHGY - DNBBY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and KBCSY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and KBCSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
KBCSY - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
BBAJF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPXXF - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPXXY - LRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNBBY - LRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
More