Advertisement
DNACF vs SPPL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and SPPL is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNACF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPPL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DNACF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
- SPPL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
| DNACF | SPPL | DNACF / SPPL | |
| Capitalization | 1.38B | 13M | 10,600% |
| EBITDA | 15.2B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -25.508 | -55.875 | 46% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.26 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 133B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 103B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 45B | N/A | - |
DNACF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DNACF | SPPL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 34% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 26 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 89% |
Advertisement
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNACF has been loosely correlated with NN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNACF jumps, then NN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NN - DNACF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPPL - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KC - DNACF | 27% Poorly correlated | +7.21% | ||
| IOT - DNACF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
More | ||||
SPPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPPL has been loosely correlated with HSTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPPL jumps, then HSTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPPL | 100% | N/A | ||
| HSTA - SPPL | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DNACF - SPPL | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MDRX - SPPL | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MSAI - SPPL | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
| WPNDF - SPPL | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||