Advertisement
DNACF vs PSSWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and PSSWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNACF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSSWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DNACF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PSSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNACF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- DNACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а +13.85% price change this week, while PSSWF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.78% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Packaged Software (-1.63% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DNACF | PSSWF | DNACF / PSSWF | |
| Capitalization | 1.79B | 817M | 219% |
| EBITDA | 62B | -255K | -24,313,725% |
| Gain YTD | 13.846 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 7.39 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 177B | 287M | 61,672% |
| Total Cash | 96.9B | 30.3M | 319,802% |
| Total Debt | 46.2B | 88.6M | 52,144% |
DNACF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| DNACF | PSSWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 10% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 10% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | N/A |
Advertisement
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and EXSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and EXSPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSSWF - DNACF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - DNACF | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.04% | ||
| BAND - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.66% | ||
| DAVA - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.42% | ||
More | ||||
PSSWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSSWF has been loosely correlated with EXSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PSSWF jumps, then EXSPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PSSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSSWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXSPF - PSSWF | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - PSSWF | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| TDOC - PSSWF | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.44% | ||
| AMPL - PSSWF | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| SLVFF - PSSWF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||