Advertisement
DNACF vs PANW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- DNACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNACF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DNACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PANW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.87%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.05%.
Reported Earning Dates
PANW is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+0.77% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Computer Communications (-1.70% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| DNACF | PANW | DNACF / PANW | |
| Capitalization | 1.92B | 140B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -24.36B | 1.94B | -1,255% |
| Gain YTD | -18.510 | 15.432 | -120% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.02 | 127.98 | 5% |
| Revenue | 132B | 9.22B | 1,432% |
| Total Cash | 76.2B | 2.9B | 2,625% |
| Total Debt | 44.4B | 338M | 13,136% |
DNACF | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNACF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (89) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that DNACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNACF (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's SMR Rating (49) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNACF (96) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as DNACF (45) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNACF (96) in the null industry. This means that PANW’s stock grew significantly faster than DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
| DNACF | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CRFAX | 12.69 | 0.07 | +0.55% |
| Calvert Focused Value A | |||
| KCVSX | 19.29 | 0.10 | +0.52% |
| Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S | |||
| PRFDX | 38.19 | 0.18 | +0.47% |
| T. Rowe Price Equity Income | |||
| GSSUX | 43.65 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R6 | |||
| FGEMX | 138.95 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesM | |||
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DNACF and EXSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNACF and EXSPF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PSSWF - DNACF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - DNACF | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.77% | ||
| BAND - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
| DAVA - DNACF | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.61% | ||
More | ||||
PANW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | -3.77% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 71% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 70% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| CYBR - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| FTNT - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||