DNACF
Price
$14.00
Change
-$3.50 (-20.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
KC
Price
$13.80
Change
-$0.10 (-0.72%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
76 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

DNACF vs KC

Header iconDNACF vs KC Comparison
Open Charts DNACF vs KCBanner chart's image
Dena
Price$14.00
Change-$3.50 (-20.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization1.68B
Kingsoft Cloud Holdings
Price$13.80
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
Volume$778.87K
Capitalization3.84B
DNACF vs KC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DNACF vs. KC commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and KC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (DNACF: $14.00 vs. KC: $13.90)
Brand notoriety: DNACF and KC are both not notable
DNACF represents the Industrial Conglomerates, while KC is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DNACF: 1% vs. KC: 152%
Market capitalization -- DNACF: $1.68B vs. KC: $3.84B
DNACF [@Industrial Conglomerates] is valued at $1.68B. KC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $135.87B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $14.14B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DNACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DNACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KC is a better buy in the long-term than DNACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DNACF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DNACF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNACF is a better buy in the short-term than KC.

Price Growth

DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -20.00% price change this week, while KC (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.88%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

KC is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Conglomerates (-0.25% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KC($3.84B) has a higher market cap than DNACF($1.68B). KC YTD gains are higher at: 32.507 vs. DNACF (-36.795). KC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65B vs. DNACF (-24.36B). DNACF has more cash in the bank: 76.2B vs. KC (2.38B). KC has less debt than DNACF: KC (4.66B) vs DNACF (44.4B). DNACF has higher revenues than KC: DNACF (132B) vs KC (7.98B).
DNACFKCDNACF / KC
Capitalization1.68B3.84B44%
EBITDA-24.36B-1.65B1,479%
Gain YTD-36.79532.507-113%
P/E Ratio9.49N/A-
Revenue132B7.98B1,654%
Total Cash76.2B2.38B3,198%
Total Debt44.4B4.66B954%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DNACF: Fundamental Ratings
DNACF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DNACFKC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DNACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OGMIX46.061.32
+2.95%
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R6
FCCNX76.82N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Canada C
GBLEX40.32-0.20
-0.49%
American Funds Global Balanced F1
APSGX17.42-0.10
-0.57%
NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class I
MSSVX8.10-0.08
-0.98%
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth N

DNACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNACF has been loosely correlated with NN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNACF jumps, then NN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNACF
1D Price
Change %
DNACF100%
-20.00%
NN - DNACF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
EXSPF - DNACF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
SPPL - DNACF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
KC - DNACF
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.89%
IOT - DNACF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
More

KC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KC has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KC jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KC
1D Price
Change %
KC100%
-5.89%
BILI - KC
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.65%
API - KC
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
YMM - KC
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
PAGS - KC
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
MSTR - KC
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
More