Advertisement
DNACF vs DSNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DNACF is a Hold and DSNY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DNACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- DNACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- DSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DNACF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DSNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- DNACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- DSNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
DNACF (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DSNY (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was +1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.32%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (+1.41% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
@Packaged Software (-1.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DNACF | DSNY | DNACF / DSNY | |
| Capitalization | 1.72B | 4.34M | 39,705% |
| EBITDA | -24.36B | 326K | -7,472,392% |
| Gain YTD | -20.993 | -33.824 | 62% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.88 | 65.00 | 18% |
| Revenue | 132B | 4.5M | 2,930,728% |
| Total Cash | 76.2B | 1.26M | 6,038,035% |
| Total Debt | 44.4B | 0 | - |
DNACF | DSNY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DNACF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSNY (66). This means that DNACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSNY’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DSNY (100). This means that DNACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DSNY’s over the last 12 months.
DSNY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as DNACF (96). This means that DSNY’s stock grew similarly to DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
DNACF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as DSNY (63). This means that DNACF’s stock grew similarly to DSNY’s over the last 12 months.
DSNY's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNACF (89). This means that DSNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNACF’s over the last 12 months.
| DNACF | DSNY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 35% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 28 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
DNACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DNACF has been loosely correlated with NN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DNACF jumps, then NN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DNACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NN - DNACF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| EXSPF - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SPPL - DNACF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.48% | ||
| KC - DNACF | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.44% | ||
| IOT - DNACF | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.43% | ||
More | ||||
DSNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DSNY and TRUG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DSNY and TRUG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DSNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSNY | 100% | N/A | ||
| TRUG - DSNY | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| DASTF - DSNY | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.56% | ||
| EMCHF - DSNY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EGHSF - DSNY | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| DNACF - DSNY | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||