DMZPY
Price
$7.74
Change
+$0.70 (+9.94%)
Updated
Jan 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DPZUF
Price
$14.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMZPY vs DPZUF

Header iconDMZPY vs DPZUF Comparison
Open Charts DMZPY vs DPZUFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$7.74
Change+$0.70 (+9.94%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization1.47B
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$14.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$370
Capitalization1.47B
DMZPY vs DPZUF Comparison Chart in %
DMZPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DPZUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMZPY vs. DPZUF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMZPY is a Hold and DPZUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (DMZPY: $7.74 vs. DPZUF: $14.30)
Brand notoriety: DMZPY and DPZUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMZPY: 36% vs. DPZUF: 46%
Market capitalization -- DMZPY: $1.47B vs. DPZUF: $1.47B
DMZPY [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.47B. DPZUF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMZPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDPZUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DMZPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DPZUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the long-term than DMZPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMZPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DPZUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMZPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DPZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZUF is a better buy in the short-term than DMZPY.

Price Growth

DMZPY (@Restaurants) experienced а +12.04% price change this week, while DPZUF (@Restaurants) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.39% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMZPY($1.47B) and DPZUF($1.47B) have the same market capitalization . DMZPY (139.34) and DPZUF (133.33) have similar P/E ratio . DMZPY YTD gains are higher at: 12.036 vs. DPZUF (0.000). DMZPY (180M) and DPZUF (180M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . DMZPY (2.3B) and DPZUF (2.3B) have equivalent revenues.
DMZPYDPZUFDMZPY / DPZUF
Capitalization1.47B1.47B100%
EBITDA180M180M100%
Gain YTD12.0360.000-
P/E Ratio139.34133.33105%
Revenue2.3B2.3B100%
Total CashN/A153M-
Total DebtN/A1.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMZPY vs DPZUF: Fundamental Ratings
DMZPY
DPZUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8845
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPZUF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (58). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (100). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DPZUF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DMZPY (91). This means that DPZUF’s stock grew similarly to DMZPY’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (44). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

DMZPY's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as DPZUF (4). This means that DMZPY’s stock grew similarly to DPZUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMZPYDPZUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMZPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DPZUF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWADX8.310.05
+0.61%
American Century Value A
IVORX17.890.09
+0.51%
Nomura Mid Cap Income Opps R
BCICX10.640.01
+0.09%
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Investor C
DAMDX27.170.02
+0.07%
Dunham Monthly Distribution A
SSEFX13.32-0.03
-0.22%
SouthernSun U.S. Equity, N

DMZPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMZPY and KRUS have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMZPY and KRUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMZPY
1D Price
Change %
DMZPY100%
N/A
KRUS - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
DPUKY - DMZPY
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
DPZUF - DMZPY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GGGSF - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMZPY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPZUF and RAVE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPZUF and RAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZUF
1D Price
Change %
DPZUF100%
N/A
RAVE - DPZUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
BDVB - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DPZUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPZUF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More