DMXCF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MSMGF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
20.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMXCF vs MSMGF

Header iconDMXCF vs MSMGF Comparison
Open Charts DMXCF vs MSMGFBanner chart's image
District Metals
Price$0.53
Change+$0.02 (+3.92%)
Volume$30.83K
CapitalizationN/A
Grid Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$63.57K
Capitalization20.31M
DMXCF vs MSMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DMXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMXCF vs. MSMGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMXCF is a Hold and MSMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (DMXCF: $0.53 vs. MSMGF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: DMXCF and MSMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMXCF: 43% vs. MSMGF: 112%
Market capitalization -- DMXCF: $0 vs. MSMGF: $20.31M
DMXCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. MSMGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMXCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DMXCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DMXCF is a better buy in the long-term than MSMGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSMGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MSMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSMGF is a better buy in the short-term than DMXCF.

Price Growth

DMXCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.42% price change this week, while MSMGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMXCF YTD gains are higher at: 87.182 vs. MSMGF (18.400).
DMXCFMSMGFDMXCF / MSMGF
CapitalizationN/A20.3M-
EBITDAN/A-10.01M-
Gain YTD87.18218.400474%
P/E RatioN/A65.79-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A8.52M-
Total DebtN/A74.7K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMXCF vs MSMGF: Fundamental Ratings
DMXCF
MSMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMXCF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSMGF (99). This means that DMXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

DMXCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSMGF (100). This means that DMXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

DMXCF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (99). This means that DMXCF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

DMXCF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMGF (59). This means that DMXCF’s stock grew similarly to MSMGF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DMXCF (100). This means that MSMGF’s stock grew significantly faster than DMXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMXCFMSMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIAC0.05N/A
N/A
Princeton Capital Corporation
CYDX0.25N/A
N/A
CYduct Diagnostics Inc.
KPTCY6.85N/A
N/A
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
PSSWF23.79N/A
N/A
PSI SOFTWARE AG
BOUYY9.17-0.03
-0.33%
Bouygues SA

DMXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMXCF and SRUUF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMXCF and SRUUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMXCF
1D Price
Change %
DMXCF100%
+3.03%
SRUUF - DMXCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
WSTRF - DMXCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
NILIF - DMXCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
MGAFF - DMXCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
MALRY - DMXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
More

MSMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSMGF and KCCFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSMGF and KCCFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSMGF
1D Price
Change %
MSMGF100%
N/A
KCCFF - MSMGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
MTLFF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
DMXCF - MSMGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
MMLTF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGCF - MSMGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More