Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMSFX vs GCRTX
DMSFX vs GCRTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMSFX vs. GCRTX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMSFX is a Hold and GCRTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCRTX has more cash in the bank: 4.81B vs. DMSFX (529M). DMSFX pays higher dividends than GCRTX: DMSFX (6.09) vs GCRTX (0.22). DMSFX was incepted earlier than GCRTX: DMSFX (8 years) vs GCRTX (17 years). GCRTX (1.94) is less costly to investors than DMSFX (1.80). GCRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 179.00 vs. DMSFX (58.00). DMSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCRTX: DMSFX (0) vs GCRTX (1000). DMSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. GCRTX (4.20). DMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.95 vs. GCRTX (12.02).
| DMSFX | GCRTX | DMSFX / GCRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 1.85 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.634 | 2.005 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 529M | 4.81B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 0.22 | 2,746% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 4.20 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.85 | 18.22 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.95 | 12.02 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers