DMPZF
Price
$2.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.06B
GGGSF
Price
$21.41
Change
-$0.37 (-1.70%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMPZF vs GGGSF

Header iconDMPZF vs GGGSF Comparison
Open Charts DMPZF vs GGGSFBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$2.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$104
Capitalization1.06B
Greggs
Price$21.41
Change-$0.37 (-1.70%)
Volume$1.68K
Capitalization2.19B
DMPZF vs GGGSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMPZF vs. GGGSF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMPZF is a Hold and GGGSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (DMPZF: $2.75 vs. GGGSF: $21.41)
Brand notoriety: DMPZF and GGGSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMPZF: 10% vs. GGGSF: 165%
Market capitalization -- DMPZF: $1.06B vs. GGGSF: $2.19B
DMPZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.06B. GGGSF’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGGGSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GGGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the long-term than DMPZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMPZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGGSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DMPZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GGGSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGGSF is a better buy in the short-term than DMPZF.

Price Growth

DMPZF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGGSF (@Restaurants) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GGGSF($2.19B) has a higher market cap than DMPZF($1.06B). GGGSF has higher P/E ratio than DMPZF: GGGSF (11.24) vs DMPZF (10.29). DMPZF YTD gains are higher at: -28.385 vs. GGGSF (-37.858). GGGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 359M vs. DMPZF (163M). GGGSF has more cash in the bank: 32.5M vs. DMPZF (14.4M). DMPZF has less debt than GGGSF: DMPZF (230M) vs GGGSF (451M). GGGSF has higher revenues than DMPZF: GGGSF (2.08B) vs DMPZF (669M).
DMPZFGGGSFDMPZF / GGGSF
Capitalization1.06B2.19B48%
EBITDA163M359M45%
Gain YTD-28.385-37.85875%
P/E Ratio10.2911.2492%
Revenue669M2.08B32%
Total Cash14.4M32.5M44%
Total Debt230M451M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMPZF vs GGGSF: Fundamental Ratings
DMPZF
GGGSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
1136
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8993
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMPZF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (11). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (100). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (36). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GGGSF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (88). This means that GGGSF’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GGGSF (93). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to GGGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMPZFGGGSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DMPZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GGGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEIHX52.490.08
+0.15%
MFS Value R3
GCMTX36.88-0.10
-0.27%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Inv
TCSEX18.76-0.09
-0.48%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity A
CAABX26.82-0.16
-0.59%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders C
BOPAX26.06-0.34
-1.29%
Sterling Capital Special Opps A

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDVB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDVB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDVB - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGF - DMPZF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPGY - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
KRUS - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
DPUKY - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.17%
More

GGGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGGSF and THCH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGGSF and THCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGGSF
1D Price
Change %
GGGSF100%
-1.68%
THCH - GGGSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKNCY - GGGSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
HLFFF - GGGSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.55%
DMPZF - GGGSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DMZPY - GGGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
More