DMPZF
Price
$3.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
DPUKY
Price
$6.95
Change
+$0.25 (+3.73%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

DMPZF vs DPUKY

Header iconDMPZF vs DPUKY Comparison
Open Charts DMPZF vs DPUKYBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza Australia New Zealand
Price$3.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.3B
Dominos Pizza UK and IRL
Price$6.95
Change+$0.25 (+3.73%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.3B
DMPZF vs DPUKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DMPZF vs. DPUKY commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMPZF is a Buy and DPUKY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (DMPZF: $3.64 vs. DPUKY: $6.95)
Brand notoriety: DMPZF and DPUKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DMPZF: 4% vs. DPUKY: 11%
Market capitalization -- DMPZF: $1.3B vs. DPUKY: $1.3B
DMPZF [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.3B. DPUKY’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DMPZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDPUKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DMPZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DPUKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DMPZF is a better buy in the long-term than DPUKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPUKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DPUKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

DMPZF (@Restaurants) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DPUKY (@Restaurants) price change was +4.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.89% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DMPZF($1.3B) and DPUKY($1.3B) have the same market capitalization . DMPZF (11.91) and DPUKY (11.37) have similar P/E ratio . DMPZF YTD gains are higher at: -5.208 vs. DPUKY (-10.183).
DMPZFDPUKYDMPZF / DPUKY
Capitalization1.3B1.3B100%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.208-10.18351%
P/E Ratio11.9111.37105%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DMPZF vs DPUKY: Fundamental Ratings
DMPZF
DPUKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1111
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4458
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DPUKY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (8). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (100). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (11). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DPUKY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as DMPZF (58). This means that DPUKY’s stock grew similarly to DMPZF’s over the last 12 months.

DMPZF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as DPUKY (58). This means that DMPZF’s stock grew similarly to DPUKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMPZFDPUKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPUKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGTTX40.670.01
+0.02%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R3
ARDEX6.21N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value N
SVUIX39.56-0.04
-0.10%
NAA SMid Cap Value Institutional
GSNPX20.53-0.02
-0.10%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc P
IGIIX42.27-0.08
-0.19%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class I

DMPZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DMPZF and BDVB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMPZF and BDVB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMPZF
1D Price
Change %
DMPZF100%
N/A
BDVB - DMPZF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
CMPGF - DMPZF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
CMPGY - DMPZF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
KRUS - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.15%
DPUKY - DMPZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DPUKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DPUKY and BROS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DPUKY and BROS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPUKY
1D Price
Change %
DPUKY100%
N/A
BROS - DPUKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.40%
CMPGY - DPUKY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
DMZPY - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPZZF - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRUS - DPUKY
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.15%
More