Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs XLB
DMAT vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs XLB
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$18.61
Change+$0.35 (+1.92%)
Volume$16.46K
Net Assets4.16M
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$90.67
Change+$0.46 (+0.51%)
Volume$48.47K
Net Assets5.46B
DMAT vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. XLB commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and XLB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.46B vs. DMAT (4.16M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: DMAT (32.739) vs XLB (8.274). DMAT was incepted earlier than XLB: DMAT (3 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| DMAT | XLB | DMAT / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 32.739 | 8.274 | 396% |
| Net Assets | 4.16M | 5.46B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 13.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 1.37 | 1.94 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +4.75% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 73% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.66% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y