Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs XLB
DMAT vs XLB Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs XLB
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$16.50
Change+$0.32 (+1.98%)
Volume$5.39K
Net Assets3.63M
The Materials Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$87.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.13%)
Volume$4.69M
Net Assets5.33B
DMAT vs XLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. XLB commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and XLB is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLB has more net assets: 5.33B vs. DMAT (3.63M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than XLB: DMAT (17.689) vs XLB (5.489). DMAT was incepted earlier than XLB: DMAT (3 years) vs XLB (27 years). XLB (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). DMAT has a higher turnover XLB (13.00) vs XLB (13.00).
| DMAT | XLB | DMAT / XLB | |
| Gain YTD | 17.689 | 5.489 | 322% |
| Net Assets | 3.63M | 5.33B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 13.00 | 172% |
| Yield | 1.00 | 1.96 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | XLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| FCX - DMAT | 77% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| SCCO - DMAT | 73% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| HBM - DMAT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| MP - DMAT | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.59% | ||
More | ||||
XLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLB has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLB jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y