Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs NLR
DMAT vs NLR Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs NLR
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$32.11
Change+$0.56 (+1.77%)
Volume$56.79K
Net Assets29.05M
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Price$144.52
Change+$3.68 (+2.61%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets4.33B
DMAT vs NLR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. NLR commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and NLR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 4.33B vs. DMAT (29M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: DMAT (15.600) vs NLR (13.398). DMAT was incepted earlier than NLR: DMAT (4 years) vs NLR (18 years). NLR (0.56) has a lower expense ratio than DMAT (0.59). NLR has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| DMAT | NLR | DMAT / NLR | |
| Gain YTD | 15.600 | 13.398 | 116% |
| Net Assets | 29M | 4.33B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.56 | 105% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 36.00 | 62% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 2.56 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y