Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$24.41
Change-$0.80 (-3.17%)
Volume$18.93K
Net Assets9.99M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$56.84
Change-$0.58 (-1.01%)
Volume$401.2K
Net Assets1.3B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.3B vs. DMAT (9.99M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (74.160) vs LIT (39.877). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 74.160 | 39.877 | 186% |
| Net Assets | 9.99M | 1.3B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.94 | 0.47 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -3.17% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 14% Poorly correlated | -8.12% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 11% Poorly correlated | +6.24% | ||
| NIC - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.22% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -1.01% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||