Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$28.16
Change+$0.29 (+1.04%)
Volume$4.71K
Net Assets19.54M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$67.10
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
Volume$176.46K
Net Assets1.5B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Buy and LIT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.5B vs. DMAT (19.5M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (100.905) vs LIT (65.125). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 100.905 | 65.125 | 155% |
| Net Assets | 19.5M | 1.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 0.42 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||