Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$32.11
Change+$0.56 (+1.77%)
Volume$56.79K
Net Assets29.05M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$70.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
Volume$3.14K
Net Assets1.6B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.6B vs. DMAT (29M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (15.600) vs LIT (8.711). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 15.600 | 8.711 | 179% |
| Net Assets | 29M | 1.6B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 0.48 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RLBBX | 38.07 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| American Funds American Balanced R2 | |||
| DSPIX | 45.65 | -0.09 | -0.20% |
| BNY Mellon Instl S&P 500 Stk Idx I | |||
| LIRRX | 10.89 | -0.04 | -0.37% |
| Lord Abbett International Value R3 | |||
| LAMPX | 25.81 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
| Lord Abbett Dividend Growth P | |||
| WAYFX | 20.26 | -0.11 | -0.54% |
| Waycross Focused Core Equity Fund | |||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +4.46% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | +8.81% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||