Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$24.69
Change+$0.24 (+0.98%)
Volume$700
Net Assets10.2M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.70
Change+$1.39 (+2.23%)
Volume$900
Net Assets1.38B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a Hold and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.38B vs. DMAT (10.2M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (74.419) vs LIT (53.338). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 74.419 | 53.338 | 140% |
| Net Assets | 10.2M | 1.38B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.43 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TOIIX | 20.28 | 0.21 | +1.05% |
| Touchstone International Value Instl | |||
| MRFOX | 34.51 | 0.15 | +0.44% |
| Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity | |||
| NPFCX | 69.74 | 0.23 | +0.33% |
| American Funds New Perspective C | |||
| FCPVX | 20.28 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund | |||
| DTEYX | 97.93 | -0.14 | -0.14% |
| BNY Mellon Technology Growth Y | |||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.20% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +7.92% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||