Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
DMAT vs LIT
DMAT vs LIT Comparison
Open Charts DMAT vs LIT
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$25.51
Change+$0.32 (+1.27%)
Volume$100
Net Assets11.66M
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$63.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.43%)
Volume$715
Net Assets1.4B
DMAT vs LIT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
DMAT vs. LIT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DMAT is a StrongBuy and LIT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIT has more net assets: 1.4B vs. DMAT (11.7M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than LIT: DMAT (80.153) vs LIT (54.420). DMAT was incepted earlier than LIT: DMAT (4 years) vs LIT (15 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than LIT (0.75). LIT (22.87) and DMAT (22.42) have matching turnover.
| DMAT | LIT | DMAT / LIT | |
| Gain YTD | 80.153 | 54.420 | 147% |
| Net Assets | 11.7M | 1.4B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Turnover | 22.42 | 22.87 | 98% |
| Yield | 0.90 | 0.42 | 212% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| DMAT | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +5.66% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
LIT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| SQM - LIT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| ALB - LIT | 72% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| LAR - LIT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| SGML - LIT | 59% Loosely correlated | -8.72% | ||
| RIVN - LIT | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||